Thread: Does TOAST really compress the complete row?
I am confused about one claim in this blog post: https://www.2ndquadrant.com/en/blog/oracle-to-postgresql-binary-objects > All columns that come after data > 2000 bytes participate in The > Large Attribute Strorage Technique (TOAST). This storage is for the > row, not the column. Your id column comes as the last column in the > table? Whoopsie, your primary key just got shoved into blob storage I always was under the impression that TOASTing only happens on column level, not on row level. The manual does not mention anything about the whole row being TOASTed if one column exceeds the threshold. Can someone clarify please? Thomas
Thomas Kellerer <shammat@gmx.net> writes: > I am confused about one claim in this blog post: https://www.2ndquadrant.com/en/blog/oracle-to-postgresql-binary-objects >> All columns that come after data > 2000 bytes participate in The >> Large Attribute Strorage Technique (TOAST). This storage is for the >> row, not the column. Your id column comes as the last column in the >> table? Whoopsie, your primary key just got shoved into blob storage > I always was under the impression that TOASTing only happens on column level, not on row level. You're right, and the quoted text is wrong. Not only does TOAST compress fields not whole rows, but it selectively targets wider fields first. If your pkey is getting toasted, you should likely rethink your choice of pkey. (Or, possibly, you just have so many fields there's no choice but to compress all of them. Then it might be time for a table redesign.) The decision-making about this is concentrated in heap_toast_insert_or_update, which can be seen here: https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=blob;f=src/backend/access/heap/heaptoast.c regards, tom lane
Another thing that was said I wasn't aware of and have not been able to find any evidence to support:
> 10. Blobs don’t participate in Logical replication.
On 7/2/20 4:29 PM, Adam Brusselback wrote: > Another thing that was said I wasn't aware of and have not been able to > find any evidence to support: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/logical-replication-restrictions.html "Large objects (see Chapter 34) are not replicated. There is no workaround for that, other than storing data in normal tables." Of course that does not apply to bytea: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/datatype-binary.html > > > 10. Blobs don’t participate in Logical replication. -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/logical-replication-restrictions.html
>
> "Large objects (see Chapter 34) are not replicated. There is no
> workaround for that, other than storing data in normal tables."
>
> Of course that does not apply to bytea:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/datatype-binary.html
>
> "Large objects (see Chapter 34) are not replicated. There is no
> workaround for that, other than storing data in normal tables."
>
> Of course that does not apply to bytea:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/datatype-binary.html
That makes sense now, I was reading that section as if it were talking about bytea, not LO.
Thanks for pointing that out!
- Adam