The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 16487
Logged by: Felix Geisendörfer
Email address: felix@felixge.de
PostgreSQL version: 12.1
Operating system: Any
Description:
Hi all,
I believe I found a bug that causes EXPLAIN to produce JSON with
duplicate "Workers" arrays when the following conditions are met:
- The options ANALYZE, VERBOSE and FORMAT JSON are used together.
- There is a Sort node in the plan that is executed in parallel.
Below is an example that should reproduce the issue in all version of
PostgreSQL >= 10. I tested with 12.1 and 11.6.
-- Create a sample table and nudge the planner to use a parallel plan
CREATE TABLE foo AS
SELECT * FROM generate_series(1, 10000) val;
SET parallel_setup_cost = 0;
SET parallel_tuple_cost = 0;
SET min_parallel_table_scan_size=0;
-- Run the actual query that causes the invalid JSON output
EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, VERBOSE, FORMAT JSON)
SELECT * FROM foo ORDER BY val;
Below is the relevant subset of the JSON produced by the query above.
Note the duplicate "Workers" arrays:
{
"Node Type": "Sort",
"Workers": [
{
"Worker Number": 0,
"Sort Method": "quicksort",
"Sort Space Used": 25,
"Sort Space Type": "Memory"
},
{
"Worker Number": 1,
"Sort Method": "quicksort",
"Sort Space Used": 25,
"Sort Space Type": "Memory"
}
],
"Workers": [
{
"Worker Number": 0,
"Actual Startup Time": 0.230,
"Actual Total Time": 0.230,
"Actual Rows": 0,
"Actual Loops": 1
},
{
"Worker Number": 1,
"Actual Startup Time": 0.231,
"Actual Total Time": 0.231,
"Actual Rows": 0,
"Actual Loops": 1
}
]
}
According to RFC 8259, I think this is technically still valid JSON:
> When the names within an object are not unique, the behavior of
> software that receives such an object is unpredictable.
However, I'm still reporting this as a bug since I assume that the
FORMAT JSON option is intended to have good interoperability with other
software.
I've also had a look in the code, and believe the issue was introduced
into backend/commands/explain.c in bf11e7e.
If somebody is willing to guide me a little, I'd also be interested in
attempting to create a patch to fix this. I haven't contributed to
PostgreSQL before and this seems like a nice opportunity.
Cheers
Felix
