Thread: pgsql: Add kqueue(2) support to the WaitEventSet API.

pgsql: Add kqueue(2) support to the WaitEventSet API.

From
Thomas Munro
Date:
Add kqueue(2) support to the WaitEventSet API.

Use kevent(2) to wait for events on the BSD family of operating
systems and macOS.  This is similar to the epoll(2) support added
for Linux by commit 98a64d0bd.

Author: Thomas Munro
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund, Marko Tiikkaja, Tom Lane
Tested-by: Mateusz Guzik, Matteo Beccati, Keith Fiske, Heikki Linnakangas, Michael Paquier, Peter Eisentraut, Rui
DeSousa,Tom Lane, Mark Wong 
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm%3D37oF84-iXDTQ9MrGjENwVGds%2B5zTr38ca73kWR7ez_tA%40mail.gmail.com

Branch
------
master

Details
-------
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/815c2f0972c8386aba7c606f1ee6690d13b04db2

Modified Files
--------------
configure                       |   4 +-
configure.in                    |   2 +
src/backend/storage/ipc/latch.c | 300 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
src/include/pg_config.h.in      |   6 +
src/tools/msvc/Solution.pm      |   2 +
5 files changed, 311 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)


Re: pgsql: Add kqueue(2) support to the WaitEventSet API.

From
Michael Paquier
Date:
Hi Thomas,

On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 04:59:10AM +0000, Thomas Munro wrote:
> Add kqueue(2) support to the WaitEventSet API.
>
> Use kevent(2) to wait for events on the BSD family of operating
> systems and macOS.  This is similar to the epoll(2) support added
> for Linux by commit 98a64d0bd.

Worth noting this issue with the test suite of postgres_fdw for
buildfarm animal coypu, running on NetBSD:
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=coypu&dt=2020-02-19%2023%3A01%3A01
+ERROR:  kqueue failed: Too many open files
--
Michael

Attachment

Re: pgsql: Add kqueue(2) support to the WaitEventSet API.

From
Thomas Munro
Date:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 8:24 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 04:59:10AM +0000, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > Add kqueue(2) support to the WaitEventSet API.
> >
> > Use kevent(2) to wait for events on the BSD family of operating
> > systems and macOS.  This is similar to the epoll(2) support added
> > for Linux by commit 98a64d0bd.
>
> Worth noting this issue with the test suite of postgres_fdw for
> buildfarm animal coypu, running on NetBSD:
> https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=coypu&dt=2020-02-19%2023%3A01%3A01
> +ERROR:  kqueue failed: Too many open files

Hmm.  So coypu just came back after 48 days, and the new kqueue() code
fails for process 19829 after successfully running 265 log lines'
worth of  postgres_fdw tests, because it's run out of file
descriptors.  I can see that WaitLatchOrSocket() actually could leak
an epoll/kqueue socket if WaitEventSetWait() raises an error, which is
interesting, but apparently not the explanation here because we don't
see a preceding error report.  Another theory would be that this
machine has a low max_safe_fds, and NUM_RESERVED_FDS is only just
enough to handle the various sockets that postgres_fdw.sql creates and
at some point kqueue()'s demand for just one more pushed it over the
edge.  From the error text and a look at the man page for errno, this
error is EMFILE (per process limit, which could be as low as 64)
rather then ENFILE (system limit).

Remi, any chance you could run gmake installcheck under
contrib/postgres_fdw on that host, to see if this is repeatable?  Can
you tell us about the relevant limits?  Maybe ulimit -n (for the user
that runs the build farm), and also sysctl -a | grep descriptors,
sysctl -a | grep maxfiles?



Re: pgsql: Add kqueue(2) support to the WaitEventSet API.

From
Rémi Zara
Date:

> Le 20 févr. 2020 à 12:15, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 8:24 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 04:59:10AM +0000, Thomas Munro wrote:
>>> Add kqueue(2) support to the WaitEventSet API.
>>>
>>> Use kevent(2) to wait for events on the BSD family of operating
>>> systems and macOS.  This is similar to the epoll(2) support added
>>> for Linux by commit 98a64d0bd.
>>
>> Worth noting this issue with the test suite of postgres_fdw for
>> buildfarm animal coypu, running on NetBSD:
>> https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=coypu&dt=2020-02-19%2023%3A01%3A01
>> +ERROR:  kqueue failed: Too many open files
>
> Hmm.  So coypu just came back after 48 days, and the new kqueue() code
> fails for process 19829 after successfully running 265 log lines'
> worth of  postgres_fdw tests, because it's run out of file
> descriptors.  I can see that WaitLatchOrSocket() actually could leak
> an epoll/kqueue socket if WaitEventSetWait() raises an error, which is
> interesting, but apparently not the explanation here because we don't
> see a preceding error report.  Another theory would be that this
> machine has a low max_safe_fds, and NUM_RESERVED_FDS is only just
> enough to handle the various sockets that postgres_fdw.sql creates and
> at some point kqueue()'s demand for just one more pushed it over the
> edge.  From the error text and a look at the man page for errno, this
> error is EMFILE (per process limit, which could be as low as 64)
> rather then ENFILE (system limit).
>
> Remi, any chance you could run gmake installcheck under
> contrib/postgres_fdw on that host, to see if this is repeatable?  Can
> you tell us about the relevant limits?  Maybe ulimit -n (for the user
> that runs the build farm), and also sysctl -a | grep descriptors,
> sysctl -a | grep maxfiles?


Hi,

Unfortunalty, coypu went offline again. I will run tests as soon as I can bring it back up.

Rémi


Re: pgsql: Add kqueue(2) support to the WaitEventSet API.

From
Tom Lane
Date:
=?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9mi_Zara?= <remi_zara@mac.com> writes:
>> Le 20 févr. 2020 à 12:15, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> a écrit :
>> Remi, any chance you could run gmake installcheck under
>> contrib/postgres_fdw on that host, to see if this is repeatable?  Can
>> you tell us about the relevant limits?  Maybe ulimit -n (for the user
>> that runs the build farm), and also sysctl -a | grep descriptors,
>> sysctl -a | grep maxfiles?

> Unfortunalty, coypu went offline again. I will run tests as soon as I can bring it back up.

I have a working NetBSD 8/ppc installation, will try to reproduce there.

            regards, tom lane



Re: pgsql: Add kqueue(2) support to the WaitEventSet API.

From
Alexander Korotkov
Date:
On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 7:59 AM Thomas Munro <tmunro@postgresql.org> wrote:
> Add kqueue(2) support to the WaitEventSet API.
>
> Use kevent(2) to wait for events on the BSD family of operating
> systems and macOS.  This is similar to the epoll(2) support added
> for Linux by commit 98a64d0bd.

I'm not sure if it was already reported in this thread (it seems to be
not at the first glance), but I've discovered following issue on macos
10.13.6.  If backend is under lldb and does XactLockTableWait(), then
it does proc_exit(1).

The full reproduction case is following.

s1# create table test (id serial primary key, value int);
s1# insert into test values (1,1);
s1# begin;
s1# update test set value = value + 1 where id = 1;

lldb attached to s2: b proc_exit
s2# update test set value = value + 1 where id = 1;

(lldb) bt
* thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 2.1
  * frame #0: 0x000000010f9a7f5b postgres`proc_exit(code=1) at ipc.c:107
    frame #1: 0x000000010f9aa3b9
postgres`WaitEventSetWaitBlock(set=0x00007fabdd847c90, cur_timeout=-1,
occurred_events=0x00007ffee0796c10, nevents=1) at latch.c:1427
    frame #2: 0x000000010f9a9a43
postgres`WaitEventSetWait(set=0x00007fabdd847c90, timeout=-1,
occurred_events=0x00007ffee0796c10, nevents=1,
wait_event_info=50331652) at latch.c:1237
    frame #3: 0x000000010f9a93b5
postgres`WaitLatchOrSocket(latch=0x00000001197eacc4, wakeEvents=33,
sock=-1, timeout=-1, wait_event_info=50331652) at latch.c:428
    frame #4: 0x000000010f9a91c1
postgres`WaitLatch(latch=0x00000001197eacc4, wakeEvents=33, timeout=0,
wait_event_info=50331652) at latch.c:368
    frame #5: 0x000000010f9d65b6
postgres`ProcSleep(locallock=0x00007fabdd01d5d8,
lockMethodTable=0x000000010fdb5cf8) at proc.c:1286
    frame #6: 0x000000010f9c2af9
postgres`WaitOnLock(locallock=0x00007fabdd01d5d8,
owner=0x00007fabdf0056d0) at lock.c:1766
    frame #7: 0x000000010f9c13a1
postgres`LockAcquireExtended(locktag=0x00007ffee0797140, lockmode=5,
sessionLock=false, dontWait=false, reportMemoryError=true,
locallockp=0x0000000000000000) at lock.c:1048
    frame #8: 0x000000010f9c08b5
postgres`LockAcquire(locktag=0x00007ffee0797140, lockmode=5,
sessionLock=false, dontWait=false) at lock.c:713
    frame #9: 0x000000010f9bef32 postgres`XactLockTableWait(xid=511,
rel=0x000000011031e148, ctid=0x00007ffee0797394, oper=XLTW_Update) at
lmgr.c:658
    frame #10: 0x000000010f4e9cab
postgres`heap_update(relation=0x000000011031e148,
otid=0x00007ffee0797818, newtup=0x00007fabdd847a48, cid=0,
crosscheck=0x0000000000000000, wait=true, tmfd=0x00007ffee07976f0,
lockmode=0x00007ffee07976d8) at heapam.c:3239
    frame #11: 0x000000010f4f9353
postgres`heapam_tuple_update(relation=0x000000011031e148,
otid=0x00007ffee0797818, slot=0x00007fabdc828558, cid=0,
snapshot=0x00007fabdc818170, crosscheck=0x0000000000000000, wait=true,
tmfd=0x00007ffee07976f0, lockmode=0x00007ffee07976d8,
update_indexes=0x00007ffee07976d6) at heapam_handler.c:326
    frame #12: 0x000000010f7ba73d
postgres`table_tuple_update(rel=0x000000011031e148,
otid=0x00007ffee0797818, slot=0x00007fabdc828558, cid=0,
snapshot=0x00007fabdc818170, crosscheck=0x0000000000000000, wait=true,
tmfd=0x00007ffee07976f0, lockmode=0x00007ffee07976d8,
update_indexes=0x00007ffee07976d6) at tableam.h:1293
    frame #13: 0x000000010f7b8952
postgres`ExecUpdate(mtstate=0x00007fabdc826ca8,
tupleid=0x00007ffee0797818, oldtuple=0x0000000000000000,
slot=0x00007fabdc828558, planSlot=0x00007fabdc828408,
epqstate=0x00007fabdc826da0, estate=0x00007fabdc826920,
canSetTag=true) at nodeModifyTable.c:1336
    frame #14: 0x000000010f7b6d5a
postgres`ExecModifyTable(pstate=0x00007fabdc826ca8) at
nodeModifyTable.c:2246
    frame #15: 0x000000010f780e82
postgres`ExecProcNodeFirst(node=0x00007fabdc826ca8) at
execProcnode.c:444
    frame #16: 0x000000010f779332
postgres`ExecProcNode(node=0x00007fabdc826ca8) at executor.h:245
    frame #17: 0x000000010f7751b1
postgres`ExecutePlan(estate=0x00007fabdc826920,
planstate=0x00007fabdc826ca8, use_parallel_mode=false,
operation=CMD_UPDATE, sendTuples=false, numberTuples=0,
direction=ForwardScanDirection, dest=0x00007fabdd843840,
execute_once=true) at execMain.c:1646
    frame #18: 0x000000010f775072
postgres`standard_ExecutorRun(queryDesc=0x00007fabdd81ff20,
direction=ForwardScanDirection, count=0, execute_once=true) at
execMain.c:364
    frame #19: 0x000000010f774e42
postgres`ExecutorRun(queryDesc=0x00007fabdd81ff20,
direction=ForwardScanDirection, count=0, execute_once=true) at
execMain.c:308
    frame #20: 0x000000010f9eb63e
postgres`ProcessQuery(plan=0x00007fabdd8447a8, sourceText="update test
set value = value + 1 where id = 1;", params=0x0000000000000000,
queryEnv=0x0000000000000000, dest=0x00007fabdd843840,
qc=0x00007ffee0797d70) at pquery.c:160
    frame #21: 0x000000010f9ea71d
postgres`PortalRunMulti(portal=0x00007fabdd823720, isTopLevel=true,
setHoldSnapshot=false, dest=0x00007fabdd843840,
altdest=0x00007fabdd843840, qc=0x00007ffee0797d70) at pquery.c:1265
    frame #22: 0x000000010f9e9d92
postgres`PortalRun(portal=0x00007fabdd823720,
count=9223372036854775807, isTopLevel=true, run_once=true,
dest=0x00007fabdd843840, altdest=0x00007fabdd843840,
qc=0x00007ffee0797d70) at pquery.c:779
    frame #23: 0x000000010f9e5279
postgres`exec_simple_query(query_string="update test set value = value
+ 1 where id = 1;") at postgres.c:1236
    frame #24: 0x000000010f9e43b8 postgres`PostgresMain(argc=1,
argv=0x00007fabdd01fe78, dbname="postgres", username="smagen") at
postgres.c:4295
    frame #25: 0x000000010f9147a0
postgres`BackendRun(port=0x00007fabde000320) at postmaster.c:4510
    frame #26: 0x000000010f913b9a
postgres`BackendStartup(port=0x00007fabde000320) at postmaster.c:4202
    frame #27: 0x000000010f912aea postgres`ServerLoop at postmaster.c:1727
    frame #28: 0x000000010f9104fa postgres`PostmasterMain(argc=3,
argv=0x00007fabdbd009b0) at postmaster.c:1400
    frame #29: 0x000000010f7fae19 postgres`main(argc=3,
argv=0x00007fabdbd009b0) at main.c:210
    frame #30: 0x00007fff69069015 libdyld.dylib`start + 1

------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company



Re: pgsql: Add kqueue(2) support to the WaitEventSet API.

From
Thomas Munro
Date:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 12:55 AM Alexander Korotkov
<a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 7:59 AM Thomas Munro <tmunro@postgresql.org> wrote:
> > Add kqueue(2) support to the WaitEventSet API.
> >
> > Use kevent(2) to wait for events on the BSD family of operating
> > systems and macOS.  This is similar to the epoll(2) support added
> > for Linux by commit 98a64d0bd.
>
> I'm not sure if it was already reported in this thread (it seems to be
> not at the first glance), but I've discovered following issue on macos
> 10.13.6.  If backend is under lldb and does XactLockTableWait(), then
> it does proc_exit(1).

/me digs out a Macintosh

Reproduced here.  The problem seems to be that macOS's getppid()
returns the debugger's PID, while the debugger is attached.  This
doesn't happen on FreeBSD (even though the debugger does internally
become the parent, getppid() is careful to return the "real" parent
PID so that user space doesn't notice this trickery; apparently Apple
made a different choice).

The getppid() check is there to close a vanishingly rare race
condition: when creating a WaitEventSet, we ask the kernel to tell us
when the postmaster exits, but there is a possibility that the
postmaster has already exited; normally that causes an error with
errno == ESRCH (no such PID, it's already gone), but another unrelated
process might have started that has the same PID, so we check if our
ppid has changed after a successful return code.  That's not going to
work under a debugger on this OS.

Looking into some options.



Re: pgsql: Add kqueue(2) support to the WaitEventSet API.

From
Alvaro Herrera
Date:
On 2020-Mar-17, Thomas Munro wrote:

> Reproduced here.  The problem seems to be that macOS's getppid()
> returns the debugger's PID, while the debugger is attached.  This
> doesn't happen on FreeBSD (even though the debugger does internally
> become the parent, getppid() is careful to return the "real" parent
> PID so that user space doesn't notice this trickery; apparently Apple
> made a different choice).

Wow ...  Yeah, that was a known problem with FreeBSD, see
https://postgr.es/m/1292851036-sup-5399@alvh.no-ip.org
Evidently FreeBSD must have fixed it, but macOS has not caught up with
that ...

> The getppid() check is there to close a vanishingly rare race
> condition: when creating a WaitEventSet, we ask the kernel to tell us
> when the postmaster exits, but there is a possibility that the
> postmaster has already exited; normally that causes an error with
> errno == ESRCH (no such PID, it's already gone), but another unrelated
> process might have started that has the same PID, so we check if our
> ppid has changed after a successful return code.  That's not going to
> work under a debugger on this OS.

Irk.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



Re: pgsql: Add kqueue(2) support to the WaitEventSet API.

From
Thomas Munro
Date:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 9:30 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 2020-Mar-17, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > Reproduced here.  The problem seems to be that macOS's getppid()
> > returns the debugger's PID, while the debugger is attached.  This
> > doesn't happen on FreeBSD (even though the debugger does internally
> > become the parent, getppid() is careful to return the "real" parent
> > PID so that user space doesn't notice this trickery; apparently Apple
> > made a different choice).
>
> Wow ...  Yeah, that was a known problem with FreeBSD, see
> https://postgr.es/m/1292851036-sup-5399@alvh.no-ip.org
> Evidently FreeBSD must have fixed it, but macOS has not caught up with
> that ...

Oh, interesting.  Sorry to bring a variant of this problem back.

> > The getppid() check is there to close a vanishingly rare race
> > condition: when creating a WaitEventSet, we ask the kernel to tell us
> > when the postmaster exits, but there is a possibility that the
> > postmaster has already exited; normally that causes an error with
> > errno == ESRCH (no such PID, it's already gone), but another unrelated
> > process might have started that has the same PID, so we check if our
> > ppid has changed after a successful return code.  That's not going to
> > work under a debugger on this OS.
>
> Irk.

I'm now far away from my home Mac so I can't test until later but I
think we can fix this by double checking with the pipe:

-       else if (event->events == WL_POSTMASTER_DEATH && PostmasterPid
!= getppid())
+       else if (event->events == WL_POSTMASTER_DEATH &&
+                        PostmasterPid != getppid() &&
+                        !PostmasterIsAliveInternal())
+       {
+               /*
+                * The extra PostmasterIsAliveInternal() check
prevents false alarms
+                * from systems where getppid() returns a debugger PID
while being
+                * traced.
+                */
                set->report_postmaster_not_running = true;
+       }

The fast getppid() check will prevent the slow and redundant
PostmasterIsAliveInternal() check from being reached on production
systems, until the postmaster really is gone in the race scenario
described.

(Note that all of this per-lock-wait work will go away with
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/27/2452/, so I'm glad Alexander
found this now).



Re: pgsql: Add kqueue(2) support to the WaitEventSet API.

From
Thomas Munro
Date:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 10:21 AM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm now far away from my home Mac so I can't test until later but I
> think we can fix this by double checking with the pipe:

Pushed.



Re: pgsql: Add kqueue(2) support to the WaitEventSet API.

From
Tom Lane
Date:
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes:
> Pushed.

prairiedog just turned up a different issue in this area [1].
I wondered why it hadn't reported in for awhile, and upon
investigation I found that the test run was stuck in the
final pg_dump step of the pg_upgrade test.  pg_dump itself
was waiting for a query result, while the connected backend
was sitting here:

(gdb) bt
#0  0x9002ec88 in kevent ()
#1  0x0039cff8 in WaitEventSetWait (set=0x20c502c, timeout=-1, occurred_events=0xbfffdd4c, nevents=1,
wait_event_info=100663296)at latch.c:1443 
#2  0x00261d98 in secure_read (port=0x2401ba0, ptr=0x713558, len=8192) at be-secure.c:184
#3  0x00269d34 in pq_recvbuf () at pqcomm.c:950
#4  0x00269e24 in pq_getbyte () at pqcomm.c:993
#5  0x003cec2c in PostgresMain (argc=1, argv=0x38060ac, dbname=0x20c5154 "regression", username=0x20c5138 "buildfarm")
atpostgres.c:337 
#6  0x0032de0c in BackendStartup (port=0x2401ba0) at postmaster.c:4510
#7  0x0032fcf8 in PostmasterMain (argc=1585338749, argv=0x5e7e59b9) at postmaster.c:1727
#8  0x0026f32c in main (argc=6, argv=0x24009b0) at main.c:210

It'd appear that we dropped an input-is-available condition.

Now prairiedog is running a museum-grade macOS release, so
it's hardly impossible that this is a kernel bug not a
Postgres bug.  But we shouldn't jump to that conclusion,
either, given that our kevent support is so new.

            regards, tom lane

[1] https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=prairiedog&dt=2020-03-27%2018%3A55%3A51
The log shows a SIGABRT trap, but that's because I manually did "kill
-ABRT" to unblock the buildfarm animal.



Re: pgsql: Add kqueue(2) support to the WaitEventSet API.

From
Thomas Munro
Date:
On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 7:43 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes:
> > Pushed.
>
> prairiedog just turned up a different issue in this area [1].
> I wondered why it hadn't reported in for awhile, and upon
> investigation I found that the test run was stuck in the
> final pg_dump step of the pg_upgrade test.  pg_dump itself
> was waiting for a query result, while the connected backend
> was sitting here:
>
> (gdb) bt
> #0  0x9002ec88 in kevent ()
> #1  0x0039cff8 in WaitEventSetWait (set=0x20c502c, timeout=-1, occurred_events=0xbfffdd4c, nevents=1,
wait_event_info=100663296)at latch.c:1443
 
> #2  0x00261d98 in secure_read (port=0x2401ba0, ptr=0x713558, len=8192) at be-secure.c:184
> #3  0x00269d34 in pq_recvbuf () at pqcomm.c:950
> #4  0x00269e24 in pq_getbyte () at pqcomm.c:993
> #5  0x003cec2c in PostgresMain (argc=1, argv=0x38060ac, dbname=0x20c5154 "regression", username=0x20c5138
"buildfarm")at postgres.c:337
 
> #6  0x0032de0c in BackendStartup (port=0x2401ba0) at postmaster.c:4510
> #7  0x0032fcf8 in PostmasterMain (argc=1585338749, argv=0x5e7e59b9) at postmaster.c:1727
> #8  0x0026f32c in main (argc=6, argv=0x24009b0) at main.c:210
>
> It'd appear that we dropped an input-is-available condition.
>
> Now prairiedog is running a museum-grade macOS release, so
> it's hardly impossible that this is a kernel bug not a
> Postgres bug.  But we shouldn't jump to that conclusion,
> either, given that our kevent support is so new.

My first thought was that it might have been due to the EV_CLEAR flag
problem discussed elsewhere, but the failing build has commit 9b8aa092
so that's not it.

About the kernel bug hypothesis:  I see that the libevent project
doesn't use kqueue on early macOS versions due to some bug that it
tests for that apparently fails on 10.4/kernel 8.11 (what you have
there).  Kqueue was added to macOS 10.3 (which pulled a bunch of code
from FreeBSD 5 including this), so in 10.4 I suppose it was still
somewhat new.  I also found a few other vague complaints about bugs
from that era including some claims of missing events, but without
conclusions.  The kernel source is mirrored on github with change
history[1], but without commit log messages or a public bug tracker
it's practically impossible for a drive-by reader to figure out what
was broken and fixed.  That seems like a bit of a wild dino-goose
chase.

Hmm, I see that Remi also runs an ancient PowerPC Mac on macOS
10.5/Darwin 9.8.  His build farm animal "locust" hasn't reported in 22
days.  Remi, is that animal down for other reasons, or could it be
stuck like this?

Further evidence for a version-specific problem is that there are
surely many in our hacker community working on modern Macs, and I
haven't heard of any problems so far.  Of course that doesn't rule
anything out.

[1] https://github.com/apple/darwin-xnu/blob/master/bsd/kern/kern_event.c



Re: pgsql: Add kqueue(2) support to the WaitEventSet API.

From
Rémi Zara
Date:

> Le 28 mars 2020 à 23:25, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> Hmm, I see that Remi also runs an ancient PowerPC Mac on macOS
> 10.5/Darwin 9.8.  His build farm animal "locust" hasn't reported in 22
> days.  Remi, is that animal down for other reasons, or could it be
> stuck like this?

Hi,

locust is down, and due to circulation restrictions, I cannot access it for the moment. Sorry.

Rémi