Thread: Obsolete comments about semaphores in proc.c

Obsolete comments about semaphores in proc.c

From
Thomas Munro
Date:
Hi,

Commit 6753333f switched from a semaphore-based waiting to latch-based
waiting for ProcSleep()/ProcWakeup(), but left behind some stray
references to semaphores.  PSA.

-- 
Thomas Munro
https://enterprisedb.com

Attachment

Re: Obsolete comments about semaphores in proc.c

From
Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
> On 14 Jun 2019, at 01:00, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:

> Commit 6753333f switched from a semaphore-based waiting to latch-based
> waiting for ProcSleep()/ProcWakeup(), but left behind some stray
> references to semaphores.  PSA.

LGTM

cheers ./daniel



Re: Obsolete comments about semaphores in proc.c

From
Michael Paquier
Date:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 01:28:42PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> On 14 Jun 2019, at 01:00, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Commit 6753333f switched from a semaphore-based waiting to latch-based
>> waiting for ProcSleep()/ProcWakeup(), but left behind some stray
>> references to semaphores.  PSA.
>
> LGTM

Fine seen from here as well.  I am not spotting other areas, FWIW.
--
Michael

Attachment