Thread: [PATCH] remove repetitive characters in fdwhandler.sgml
Hi all, Here is a tiny patch removing repetitive characters [if] in fdwhandler.sgml. Page: https://github.com/postgres/postgres/blob/master/doc/src/sgml/fdwhandler.sgml --------------------------------------------------------------------------- <para> This function should store the tuple into the provided, or clear it if if★ The characters [if] is repeated. the row lock couldn't be obtained. The row lock type to acquire is defined by <literal>erm->markType</literal>, which is the value previously returned by <function>GetForeignRowMarkType</function>. (<literal>ROW_MARK_REFERENCE</literal> means to just re-fetch the tuple without acquiring any lock, and <literal>ROW_MARK_COPY</literal> will never be seen by this routine.) </para> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Best Regards!
Attachment
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 01:37:04AM +0000, Zhang, Jie wrote:
> Here is a tiny patch removing repetitive characters [if] in fdwhandler.sgml.
<para>
- This function should store the tuple into the provided, or clear it if if
+ This function should store the tuple into the provided, or clear it if
the row lock couldn't be obtained. The row lock type to acquire is
The typo is clear, however the formulation of the full sentence is
confusing. This function should store the tuple into the provided
slot, no?
--
Michael
Attachment
> This function should store the tuple into the provided slot, no?
Yes, this modification is easier to understand.
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Paquier [mailto:michael@paquier.xyz]
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2019 1:02 PM
To: Zhang, Jie/张 杰 <zhangjie2@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove repetitive characters in fdwhandler.sgml
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 01:37:04AM +0000, Zhang, Jie wrote:
> Here is a tiny patch removing repetitive characters [if] in fdwhandler.sgml.
<para>
- This function should store the tuple into the provided, or clear it if if
+ This function should store the tuple into the provided, or clear
+ it if
the row lock couldn't be obtained. The row lock type to acquire is
The typo is clear, however the formulation of the full sentence is confusing. This function should store the tuple
intothe provided slot, no?
--
Michael
(2019/03/13 14:02), Michael Paquier wrote: > On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 01:37:04AM +0000, Zhang, Jie wrote: >> Here is a tiny patch removing repetitive characters [if] in fdwhandler.sgml. > > <para> > - This function should store the tuple into the provided, or clear it if if > + This function should store the tuple into the provided, or clear it if > the row lock couldn't be obtained. The row lock type to acquire is > > The typo is clear, however the formulation of the full sentence is > confusing. This function should store the tuple into the provided > slot, no? Yeah, I think so too. Best regards, Etsuro Fujita
On 2019-03-13 14:55:59 +0900, Etsuro Fujita wrote: > (2019/03/13 14:02), Michael Paquier wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 01:37:04AM +0000, Zhang, Jie wrote: > > > Here is a tiny patch removing repetitive characters [if] in fdwhandler.sgml. > > > > <para> > > - This function should store the tuple into the provided, or clear it if if > > + This function should store the tuple into the provided, or clear it if > > the row lock couldn't be obtained. The row lock type to acquire is > > > > The typo is clear, however the formulation of the full sentence is > > confusing. This function should store the tuple into the provided > > slot, no? > > Yeah, I think so too. Sorry for that, I'll fix the sentence tomorrow. Andres vs Grammar: 3 : 3305. Greetings, Andres Freund
On 2019-03-12 23:19:23 -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2019-03-13 14:55:59 +0900, Etsuro Fujita wrote: > > (2019/03/13 14:02), Michael Paquier wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 01:37:04AM +0000, Zhang, Jie wrote: > > > > Here is a tiny patch removing repetitive characters [if] in fdwhandler.sgml. > > > > > > <para> > > > - This function should store the tuple into the provided, or clear it if if > > > + This function should store the tuple into the provided, or clear it if > > > the row lock couldn't be obtained. The row lock type to acquire is > > > > > > The typo is clear, however the formulation of the full sentence is > > > confusing. This function should store the tuple into the provided > > > slot, no? > > > > Yeah, I think so too. > > Sorry for that, I'll fix the sentence tomorrow. Andres vs Grammar: 3 : > 3305. And pushed. Thanks for the report!