Thread: BUG #15477: Procedure call with named inout refcursor parameter -"invalid input syntax for type boolean" error
BUG #15477: Procedure call with named inout refcursor parameter -"invalid input syntax for type boolean" error
From
PG Bug reporting form
Date:
The following bug has been logged on the website: Bug reference: 15477 Logged by: Alexey Stepanov Email address: stepaunov@gmail.com PostgreSQL version: 11.0 Operating system: RedOS (based on Red Hat Linux) (red-soft.ru) Description: Calling procedure with named inout refcursor parameter leads to "invalid input syntax for type boolean" error. Repro: /* select version() PostgreSQL 11.0 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-28), 64-bit */ drop table if exists t1; drop procedure if exists p1(integer, refcursor); create table t1 (key serial, name text); create or replace procedure p1(v_cnt int, v_ResultSet inout refcursor = null) as $$ begin insert into t1 (name) values('name_test'); open v_ResultSet for select * from t1; end; $$ language plpgsql security definer ; -- trying to call with named v_ResultSet parameter do $$ declare v_ResultSet refcursor; v_cnt integer; begin call p1(v_cnt:=v_cnt, v_ResultSet := v_ResultSet); raise notice '%', v_ResultSet; end;$$ ; result (in pgAdmin3): ERROR: invalid input syntax for type boolean: "<unnamed portal 7>" CONTEXT: PL/pgSQL function inline_code_block line 6 at CALL ********** Error ********** ERROR: invalid input syntax for type boolean: "<unnamed portal 7>" SQL state: 22P02 Context: PL/pgSQL function inline_code_block line 6 at CALL -- trying to call with ordinal parameters - success! do $$ declare v_ResultSet refcursor; v_cnt integer; begin call p1(v_cnt, v_ResultSet); raise notice '%', v_ResultSet; end;$$ ; result - ok
Re: BUG #15477: Procedure call with named inout refcursor parameter -"invalid input syntax for type boolean" error
From
Pavel Stehule
Date:
čt 1. 11. 2018 v 7:42 odesílatel PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> napsal:
The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 15477
Logged by: Alexey Stepanov
Email address: stepaunov@gmail.com
PostgreSQL version: 11.0
Operating system: RedOS (based on Red Hat Linux) (red-soft.ru)
Description:
Calling procedure with named inout refcursor parameter leads to "invalid
input syntax for type boolean" error.
Repro:
/*
select version()
PostgreSQL 11.0 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623
(Red Hat 4.8.5-28), 64-bit
*/
drop table if exists t1;
drop procedure if exists p1(integer, refcursor);
create table t1 (key serial, name text);
create or replace procedure p1(v_cnt int, v_ResultSet inout refcursor =
null)
as $$
begin
insert into t1 (name) values('name_test');
open v_ResultSet for select * from t1;
end;
$$
language plpgsql security definer
;
-- trying to call with named v_ResultSet parameter
do $$
declare
v_ResultSet refcursor;
v_cnt integer;
begin
call p1(v_cnt:=v_cnt, v_ResultSet := v_ResultSet);
raise notice '%', v_ResultSet;
end;$$
;
result (in pgAdmin3):
ERROR: invalid input syntax for type boolean: "<unnamed portal 7>"
CONTEXT: PL/pgSQL function inline_code_block line 6 at CALL
********** Error **********
ERROR: invalid input syntax for type boolean: "<unnamed portal 7>"
SQL state: 22P02
Context: PL/pgSQL function inline_code_block line 6 at CALL
-- trying to call with ordinal parameters - success!
do $$
declare
v_ResultSet refcursor;
v_cnt integer;
begin
call p1(v_cnt, v_ResultSet);
raise notice '%', v_ResultSet;
end;$$
;
result - ok
It is strange bug. When you use syntax =>, ":=" is obsolete (but still supported), then all is working
postgres=# do $$
declare
v_ResultSet refcursor;
v_cnt integer;
begin
call p1(v_cnt=>v_cnt, v_ResultSet => v_ResultSet);
raise notice '%', v_ResultSet;
end;$$
;
NOTICE: <unnamed portal 4>
DO
declare
v_ResultSet refcursor;
v_cnt integer;
begin
call p1(v_cnt=>v_cnt, v_ResultSet => v_ResultSet);
raise notice '%', v_ResultSet;
end;$$
;
NOTICE: <unnamed portal 4>
DO
looks so somewhere only new syntax is recognized and supported.
Regards
Pavel
Re: BUG #15477: Procedure call with named inout refcursor parameter -"invalid input syntax for type boolean" error
From
Pavel Stehule
Date:
It is strange bug. When you use syntax =>, ":=" is obsolete (but still supported), then all is workingpostgres=# do $$
declare
v_ResultSet refcursor;
v_cnt integer;
begin
call p1(v_cnt=>v_cnt, v_ResultSet => v_ResultSet);
raise notice '%', v_ResultSet;
end;$$
;
NOTICE: <unnamed portal 4>
DOlooks so somewhere only new syntax is recognized and supported.
no, the behave is random. Looks on uninitialized variable
first call in session fails, seconds are ok
RegardsPavel
Re: BUG #15477: Procedure call with named inout refcursor parameter - "invalid input syntax for type boolean" error
From
Andrew Gierth
Date:
>>>>> "PG" == PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes: PG> Calling procedure with named inout refcursor parameter leads to PG> "invalid input syntax for type boolean" error. I got a crash (segfault in exec_assign_value) instead. Investigating. -- Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
Re: BUG #15477: Procedure call with named inout refcursor parameter -"invalid input syntax for type boolean" error
From
Pavel Stehule
Date:
Dne čt 1. 11. 2018 16:57 uživatel Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk> napsal:
>>>>> "PG" == PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes:
PG> Calling procedure with named inout refcursor parameter leads to
PG> "invalid input syntax for type boolean" error.
I got a crash (segfault in exec_assign_value) instead. Investigating.
I sent bugfix to mailing list
Pavel
--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)