Thread: FYI, Windows buildfarm member passes all PL regression tests

FYI, Windows buildfarm member passes all PL regression tests

From
Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Today I got done an item that's been on my TODO list for some time - I
got my Windows buildfarm member building with all 3 optional PLs and
passing all their regression tests. In each case (perl, python, tcl) I
used the ActiveState versions, rather than building my own. This is the
first time we have done this on a Windows buildfarm member.

cheers

andrew

Re: FYI, Windows buildfarm member passes all PL regression tests

From
"Magnus Hagander"
Date:
> Today I got done an item that's been on my TODO list for some
> time - I got my Windows buildfarm member building with all 3
> optional PLs and passing all their regression tests. In each
> case (perl, python, tcl) I used the ActiveState versions,
> rather than building my own. This is the first time we have
> done this on a Windows buildfarm member.

Don't run with ActiveState Python. Run with the official win32 python
from the python guys themselves. There were some issues with
ActiveState, but I can't remember what they were. Could be that they are
fixed now, but I still think relying on the official distribution is
better when available (the python guys put out a win32 binary
distribution, unlike for example perl (last time I checked)).

That said, this is good news indeed :-)

//Magnus

Re: FYI, Windows buildfarm member passes all

From
Andrew Dunstan
Date:

Magnus Hagander wrote:

>>Today I got done an item that's been on my TODO list for some
>>time - I got my Windows buildfarm member building with all 3
>>optional PLs and passing all their regression tests. In each
>>case (perl, python, tcl) I used the ActiveState versions,
>>rather than building my own. This is the first time we have
>>done this on a Windows buildfarm member.
>>
>>
>
>Don't run with ActiveState Python. Run with the official win32 python
>from the python guys themselves. There were some issues with
>ActiveState, but I can't remember what they were. Could be that they are
>fixed now, but I still think relying on the official distribution is
>better when available (the python guys put out a win32 binary
>distribution, unlike for example perl (last time I checked)).
>
>That said, this is good news indeed :-)
>
>
>
>

OK, I switched to the Python project's Windows distribution (which is
more modern anyway) and it's still working. See:
http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=loris&dt=2005-07-08%2011:19:10

One reason for using the AS version of perl, is the nice PPMs of DBD::Pg
that some kind person is now delivering.

cheers

andrew