Thread: Re: explain analyze timings

Re: explain analyze timings

From
"Magnus Hagander"
Date:
> > I still left two #ifdefs in there, for the addition and
> subtraction of
> > timeval:s specifically. They could be made functions/macros
> too, just
> > not sure if it's worth it.
>
> Probably not.  What bothers me more is the unconditional use
> of a static inline function; but IIRC we are only supporting
> gcc-based builds on Windows, so that probably isn't worth
> fixing either.

I thought of that, and considered it a good thing to do it that way just
because of that. If we ever port it to something that doesn't support
it, we can always make it a regular function in the C file.

//Magnus