Thread: [HACKERS] v10 bottom-listed
In the 'ftp' listing, v10 appears at the bottom: https://www.postgresql.org/ftp/source/ With all the other v10* directories at the top, we could get a lot of people installing wrong binaries... Maybe it can be fixed so that it appears at the top. Thanks, Erik Rijkers -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
On 2017/10/05 22:28, Erik Rijkers wrote: > In the 'ftp' listing, v10 appears at the bottom: > https://www.postgresql.org/ftp/source/ > > With all the other v10* directories at the top, we could get a lot of > people installing wrong binaries... > > Maybe it can be fixed so that it appears at the top. Still see it at the bottom. Maybe ping pgsql-www? Thanks, Amit -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 3:59 AM, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
-- On 2017/10/05 22:28, Erik Rijkers wrote:
> In the 'ftp' listing, v10 appears at the bottom:
> https://www.postgresql.org/ftp/source/
>
> With all the other v10* directories at the top, we could get a lot of
> people installing wrong binaries...
>
> Maybe it can be fixed so that it appears at the top.
Still see it at the bottom. Maybe ping pgsql-www?
Turns out there was already quite an ugly hack to deal with this, so I just made it a bit more ugly. Once the caches expire I believe sorting should be correct.
On 2017/10/13 22:58, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 3:59 AM, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> > wrote: > >> On 2017/10/05 22:28, Erik Rijkers wrote: >>> In the 'ftp' listing, v10 appears at the bottom: >>> https://www.postgresql.org/ftp/source/ >>> >>> With all the other v10* directories at the top, we could get a lot of >>> people installing wrong binaries... >>> >>> Maybe it can be fixed so that it appears at the top. >> >> Still see it at the bottom. Maybe ping pgsql-www? >> > > Turns out there was already quite an ugly hack to deal with this, so I just > made it a bit more ugly. Once the caches expire I believe sorting should be > correct. Saw that it's now listed all the way up, thanks! :) Regards, Amit -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers