Thread: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14821: idle_in_transaction_session_timeout sometimesgets ignored when statement timeout is pending
Re: [BUGS] BUG #14821: idle_in_transaction_session_timeout sometimesgets ignored when statement timeout is pending
From
Lukas Fittl
Date:
Hi,
Which is implemented in the attached patch.
As per the bug report at https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170921010956.17345.61461%40wrigleys.postgresql.org it seems that the query cancellation holdoff logic in ProcessInterrupts is a bit overly aggressive in keeping other interrupts from running.
In particular I've seen an issue in the wild where idle_in_transaction_session_timeout did not get triggered because the HOLD_CANCEL_INTERRUPTS() in SocketBackend wraps around a pq_getbyte() call, and so ProcessInterrupts doesn't do anything when it gets called because the query cancel holdoff counter is positive.
Andres suggested the following re-ordering of the logic on -bugs:
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 6:29 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
if (QueryCancelPending && QueryCancelHoldoffCount != 0)
{
/* rearm */
}
else if (QueryCancelPending)
{
/* handle interrupt */
}
Which is implemented in the attached patch.
Unless someone wants to pick this up right away, I'll register it in the next commitfest tomorrow.
Best,
Lukas
--
Lukas Fittl
Attachment
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] BUG #14821:idle_in_transaction_session_timeout sometimes gets ignored when statementtimeout is pending
From
Andres Freund
Date:
Hi, On 2017-09-20 20:27:05 -0700, Lukas Fittl wrote: > As per the bug report at > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170921010956.17345.61461%40wrigleys.postgresql.org > it seems that the query cancellation holdoff logic in ProcessInterrupts is > a bit overly aggressive in keeping other interrupts from running. > > In particular I've seen an issue in the wild where > idle_in_transaction_session_timeout did not get triggered because > the HOLD_CANCEL_INTERRUPTS() in SocketBackend wraps around a pq_getbyte() > call, and so ProcessInterrupts doesn't do anything when it gets called > because the query cancel holdoff counter is positive. > > Andres suggested the following re-ordering of the logic on -bugs: I've pushed this. Thanks for the report & fix! Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] BUG #14821: idle_in_transaction_session_timeoutsometimes gets ignored when statement timeout is pending
From
Lukas Fittl
Date:
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 2:11 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
I've pushed this. Thanks for the report & fix!
Excellent, thanks!
Best,
Lukas
--
Lukas Fittl