Thread: Next release

Next release

From
Dave Page
Date:
Anyone object to doing a release on 14th September, wrapping the code on Monday 11th? This seems like the best option for our QA folks who will be off for EID somewhen in the two weeks before.

Assuming not, should this be 1.7 or 2.0?

If we go with 2.0, it'll be for "safety" given the proposed changes to path management to allow both server and desktop modes to work out of the box on Linux.

If we do that, we also need to ensure that any changes to the config database are backwards compatible, as a 2.0 release would be a side-by-side installation. Surinder; was it you that had looked into that?

Comments/thoughts?

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Re: Next release

From
Devrim Gündüz
Date:
Hi,

On Thu, 2017-08-24 at 09:58 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> Assuming not, should this be 1.7 or 2.0?
>
> If we go with 2.0, it'll be for "safety" given the proposed changes to path
> management to allow both server and desktop modes to work out of the box on
> Linux.

+1 to 2.0.

Regards,
--
Devrim Gündüz
EnterpriseDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR

Re: Next release

From
Ashesh Vashi
Date:


On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
Anyone object to doing a release on 14th September, wrapping the code on Monday 11th? This seems like the best option for our QA folks who will be off for EID somewhen in the two weeks before.
No objection! 

Assuming not, should this be 1.7 or 2.0?
2.0

-- Thanks, Ashesh 

If we go with 2.0, it'll be for "safety" given the proposed changes to path management to allow both server and desktop modes to work out of the box on Linux.

If we do that, we also need to ensure that any changes to the config database are backwards compatible, as a 2.0 release would be a side-by-side installation. Surinder; was it you that had looked into that?

Comments/thoughts?

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company