Thread: 9.4.1211 release?
Hi, github offers me 9.4.1211 release, but I haven't seen announement. Can I consider this to be supported tarball? Thanks, Pavel
Sorry, yes, I did announce it on the postgres site. Guess I forgot here
On 21 September 2016 at 07:20, Pavel Raiskup <praiskup@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi, github offers me 9.4.1211 release, but I haven't seen announement. Can I
consider this to be supported tarball?
Thanks, Pavel
--
Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc
Pavel> Hi, github offers me 9.4.1211 release, but I haven't seen announement. Can I
Pavel> consider this to be supported tarball?9.4.1211 has indeed been released yesterday with a couple of changes:
* fixed json type regression (the bug first appeared in 9.4.1210)
* 'current transaction is aborted' exception includes the original exception via caused-by chain
There's however a yet another regression since 9.4.1210: non-prepared statements replace ? via $1, so
queries that use ? kind of operators are affected (see https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/issues/643 )
I suggest to schedule 9.4.1212 soon.
Vladimir
Sorry, yes, I did announce it on the postgres site. Guess I forgot here
On 21 September 2016 at 07:20, Pavel Raiskup <praiskup@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi, github offers me 9.4.1211 release, but I haven't seen announement. Can I
consider this to be supported tarball?
Thanks, Pavel
--
Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc
Pavel> Hi, github offers me 9.4.1211 release, but I haven't seen announement. Can I
Pavel> consider this to be supported tarball?9.4.1211 has indeed been released yesterday with a couple of changes:
* fixed json type regression (the bug first appeared in 9.4.1210)
* 'current transaction is aborted' exception includes the original exception via caused-by chain
There's however a yet another regression since 9.4.1210: non-prepared statements replace ? via $1, so
queries that use ? kind of operators are affected (see https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/issues/643 )
I suggest to schedule 9.4.1212 soon.
Vladimir