Thread: Feature Matrix
Is anybody working on Feature Matrix entries for 9.6?
(Not volunteering to do it, but I'll help out with the things that need to be added on the website side of things to handle them)
On 09/21/2016 12:37 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > Is anybody working on Feature Matrix entries for 9.6? > > (Not volunteering to do it, but I'll help out with the things that need > to be added on the website side of things to handle them) Huh, good point! Lemme look at the code for that ... is this in django somewhere? Web code seems to indicate that it should be, but I don't see anything in Admin to edit it. -- -- Josh Berkus Red Hat OSAS (any opinions are my own)
Josh Berkus wrote: > On 09/21/2016 12:37 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > Is anybody working on Feature Matrix entries for 9.6? > > > > (Not volunteering to do it, but I'll help out with the things that need > > to be added on the website side of things to handle them) > > Huh, good point! > > Lemme look at the code for that ... is this in django somewhere? Web > code seems to indicate that it should be, but I don't see anything in > Admin to edit it. It is there, under "Featurematrix" -> "Features". -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
All, I've made a bunch of updates to the Feature Matrix, including adding new FDW and Replication categories. Magnus, Alvaro, can one of you make 9.6 "visible" so that others can audit the features I've chosen to add? -- -- Josh Berkus Red Hat OSAS (any opinions are my own)
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 6:46 AM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
I've enabled default visibilty but I don't think it'll actually become visible until the version is listed as not being testing anymore. This is typically done as part of the release. It might be good to have a "preview" feature on it, but we don't have one at this point :(
All,
I've made a bunch of updates to the Feature Matrix, including adding new
FDW and Replication categories.
Magnus, Alvaro, can one of you make 9.6 "visible" so that others can
audit the features I've chosen to add?
//Magnus
All, The 9.6 feature matrix is up (reload the page if you don't see it) https://www.postgresql.org/about/featurematrix/ Please comment/fix! - have I included all of the new 9.6 features that I should? - are descriptions accurate? - are there features which are now obsolete which should be marked? -- -- Josh Berkus Red Hat OSAS (any opinions are my own)
> I've enabled default visibilty but I don't think it'll actually become > visible until the version is listed as not being testing anymore. This > is typically done as part of the release. It might be good to have a > "preview" feature on it, but we don't have one at this point :( Thanks. I'd argue that we should display the feature matrix as soon as we go into beta. I mean, we know what the features are at that point. -- -- Josh Berkus Red Hat OSAS (any opinions are my own)
On 09/27/2016 09:21 AM, Josh Berkus wrote: > >> I've enabled default visibilty but I don't think it'll actually become >> visible until the version is listed as not being testing anymore. This >> is typically done as part of the release. It might be good to have a >> "preview" feature on it, but we don't have one at this point :( > > Thanks. > > I'd argue that we should display the feature matrix as soon as we go > into beta. I mean, we know what the features are at that point. > I would agree with this. JD -- Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/ +1-503-667-4564 PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development. Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them. Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own.