Thread: Psycopg2 for PostgreSQL 9.3
Hi, Is Psycopg2 2.5 compatible with PostgreSQL 9.3? If not, any plans for a compatible version? 9.3 is entering beta next week, so testers will probably need an compatible package. Regards, -- Devrim GÜNDÜZ Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr http://www.gunduz.org Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz
Attachment
On May 1, 2013, at 11:41 AM, Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote: > Is Psycopg2 2.5 compatible with PostgreSQL 9.3? Were/are there any substantial libpq changes in 9.3? -- -- Christophe Pettus xof@thebuild.com
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 7:41 PM, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@gunduz.org> wrote: > Is Psycopg2 2.5 compatible with PostgreSQL 9.3? If not, any plans for a > compatible version? 9.3 is entering beta next week, so testers will > probably need an compatible package. Just run the test suite against a PG server 9.3 (compiled from current master, commit 200ba16) using libpq both 9.1 and 9.3 and have no problem to report: all the tests pass on our side. -- Daniele
On Wednesday 01 May 2013, Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote: > Hi, > > Is Psycopg2 2.5 compatible with PostgreSQL 9.3? If not, any plans for a > compatible version? 9.3 is entering beta next week, so testers will > probably need an compatible package. > > Regards, I've been using it for some months, against the "master" branch of Postgres. Like a "burn-in" test. No problems mentioned, whatsoever. My plans are to update[1] my pg9.3 server a few days before beta, just to have the last PG_CATALOG_VER . If anything pops up, I'll let you know. [1] using RPMs, of course ;) -- Say NO to spam and viruses. Stop using Microsoft Windows!
Hi, On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 21:45 +0100, Daniele Varrazzo wrote: > > Just run the test suite against a PG server 9.3 (compiled from current > master, commit 200ba16) using libpq both 9.1 > and 9.3 and have no problem to report: all the tests pass on our side. How different is master as compared to 2.5? Should I just package 2.5 for 9.3? Regards, -- Devrim GÜNDÜZ Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr http://www.gunduz.org Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz
Attachment
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@gunduz.org> wrote: > > How different is master as compared to 2.5? Should I just package 2.5 > for 9.3? 'master' is going ahead; for the moment there is probably little more than a few docs fixes. But the version number has already been bumped ahead there. For packaging you should check out tag 2_5. Previously we were pushing our progressive changes into 'devel' and only committing stable branches into 'master', following the idea in <http://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/>. But although that model works fine it only deals with a single "master" and becomes awkward with maintenance branches (currently maint_2_4, maint_2_5). -- Daniele
Hi, On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 15:41 +0100, Daniele Varrazzo wrote: > 'master' is going ahead; for the moment there is probably little more > than a few docs fixes. But the version number has already been bumped > ahead there. For packaging you should check out tag 2_5. Packagers do not checkout from SCM -- we download released versions. Regards, -- Devrim GÜNDÜZ Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr http://www.gunduz.org Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz