Thread: RELEASE: psycopg 2.4 beta 2
Hi *, I just tagged 2.4 beta 2 on git and created the signed release tarballs. Not many changes this time but some bug fixes. http://initd.org/psycopg/tarballs/psycopg2-2.4-beta2.tar.gz http://initd.org/psycopg/tarballs/psycopg2-2.4-beta2.tar.gz.asc Have fun, federico -- Federico Di Gregorio federico.digregorio@dndg.it Studio Associato Di Nunzio e Di Gregorio http://dndg.it In some countries (e.g., Germany) even many brands of toilet paper have format A6. [http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/iso-paper.html]
[cc'ing the ML] On 15/02/11 00:36, Jason Erickson wrote: > Tried out the release and it looks like two files are missing. It could > be because I named them funny (with a preceding _). The files are: > psycopg/_psycopg.vc9.amd64.manifest > psycopg/_psycopg.vc9.x86.manifest > > Once I copied the files into your release, I was able to build the code. > If you need the files, let me know and I can get them to you. > > If you would like them to be named something different, we can change > the filenames as well. We will need to change the reference in setup.py > if we do that. No problem. I just pushed to the devel branch a fixed MANIFEST.in. The files are now included when making sdist. federico -- Federico Di Gregorio federico.digregorio@dndg.it Studio Associato Di Nunzio e Di Gregorio http://dndg.it If nobody understand you, that doesn't mean you're an artist. -- anonymous
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 8:26 AM, Federico Di Gregorio <federico.digregorio@dndg.it> wrote: > [cc'ing the ML] > > On 15/02/11 00:36, Jason Erickson wrote: >> Tried out the release and it looks like two files are missing. It could >> be because I named them funny (with a preceding _). The files are: >> psycopg/_psycopg.vc9.amd64.manifest >> psycopg/_psycopg.vc9.x86.manifest >> >> Once I copied the files into your release, I was able to build the code. >> If you need the files, let me know and I can get them to you. Jason, does it mean that you weren't able to build the packages from the sdist or that the testing packages you released aren't working? I assume the first. FYI, I've told the mod_wsgi guys about your packages <http://groups.google.com/group/modwsgi/browse_thread/thread/137f88ac6927df59> so I hope to get some testing soon. -- Daniele
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011, Daniele Varrazzo wrote: > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 8:26 AM, Federico Di Gregorio > <federico.digregorio@dndg.it> wrote: >> [cc'ing the ML] >> >> On 15/02/11 00:36, Jason Erickson wrote: >>> Tried out the release and it looks like two files are missing. It could >>> be because I named them funny (with a preceding _). The files are: >>> psycopg/_psycopg.vc9.amd64.manifest >>> psycopg/_psycopg.vc9.x86.manifest >>> >>> Once I copied the files into your release, I was able to build the code. >>> If you need the files, let me know and I can get them to you. > > Jason, does it mean that you weren't able to build the packages from > the sdist or that the testing packages you released aren't working? I > assume the first. Correct, the sdist packages had everthing but those two files. To get the 'beta' out there, I cheated and copied those files over into my build. I'll need to make a note that if I add files, need to make sure the sdist will add them, too. > FYI, I've told the mod_wsgi guys about your packages > <http://groups.google.com/group/modwsgi/browse_thread/thread/137f88ac6927df59> > so I hope to get some testing soon. Great, fingers are crossed. > -- Daniele -jason