Thread: Bogus List-Archive headers in PG list mail

Recent emails in the PG lists (all of 'em, AFAICT) are going out withList-Archive: <>
instead of the expected value, such asList-Archive: <http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs>
The other List-foo headers seem okay.

Some excavation in my inbox says this changed sometime betweenThu, 09 Aug 2012 21:26:19 +0000Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:22:10
+0000
Can we get it fixed please?
        regards, tom lane

On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 05:15:46PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Recent emails in the PG lists (all of 'em, AFAICT) are going out with
>     List-Archive: <>
> instead of the expected value, such as
>     List-Archive: <http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs>
> The other List-foo headers seem okay.
> 
> Some excavation in my inbox says this changed sometime between
>     Thu, 09 Aug 2012 21:26:19 +0000
>     Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:22:10 +0000
> Can we get it fixed please?

I can confirm that the problem still exists.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +

Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of lun oct 01 15:11:07 -0300 2012:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 05:15:46PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Recent emails in the PG lists (all of 'em, AFAICT) are going out with
> >     List-Archive: <>
> > instead of the expected value, such as
> >     List-Archive: <http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs>
> > The other List-foo headers seem okay.
> >
> > Some excavation in my inbox says this changed sometime between
> >     Thu, 09 Aug 2012 21:26:19 +0000
> >     Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:22:10 +0000
> > Can we get it fixed please?
>
> I can confirm that the problem still exists.

I can confirm that I have just fixed it.

--
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services