Thread: Recent spam on general
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 I just ubsubscribed sj_savio@yahoo.com, which posted a spam to pgsql-general that made it through my filters and, as Tom pointed out, had a non-blank subject line. Interestingly, the spam score was MINUS 3.6, so we have some tweaking to do :) Highlights: > Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Fwd: no more strict deadlines!! > Date: 4:15 AM on Wednesday, April 11, 2012 > X-Maillaunder-Av-Scan: YES:33e35bd1c297b6e2f973326ac0219a03 > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on incoming.maillaunder.com > X-Spam-Level: > X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RDNS_NONE autolearn=hamversion=3.2.5 > X-Spam-PDF-Info: pdf=_PDFCOUNT_, pdfimg=_PDFIMGCOUNT_, ver=_PDFVERSION_, name=_PDFNAME_ > X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 > X-Yahoo-Newman-ID: 375087.14130.bm@omp1041.mail.bf1.yahoo.com > X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.117.340979 > X-PG-Spam-Score: 2.1 (++) > X-Mailing-List: pgsql-general - -- Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201204121218 http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEAREDAAYFAk+HAIEACgkQvJuQZxSWSsg0ugCeIFt1FsKMim6PJdGK7peHwVq2 Yv0AoNUi95zh3BG9ejbaRHPfeqtkvWpo =5TUn -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 18:19, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg@turnstep.com> wrote: > > > I just ubsubscribed sj_savio@yahoo.com, which posted a spam to > pgsql-general that made it through my filters and, as > Tom pointed out, had a non-blank subject line. Interestingly, > the spam score was MINUS 3.6, so we have some tweaking > to do :) Highlights: You're looking at the wrong header. Our spam score gave it 2.1. Which is still not very much, but a lot better than minus 3.6.. //Magnus >> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Fwd: no more strict deadlines!! >> Date: 4:15 AM on Wednesday, April 11, 2012 >> X-Maillaunder-Av-Scan: YES:33e35bd1c297b6e2f973326ac0219a03 >> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on incoming.maillaunder.com >> X-Spam-Level: >> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RDNS_NONE autolearn=hamversion=3.2.5 >> X-Spam-PDF-Info: pdf=_PDFCOUNT_, pdfimg=_PDFIMGCOUNT_, ver=_PDFVERSION_, name=_PDFNAME_ >> X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 >> X-Yahoo-Newman-ID: 375087.14130.bm@omp1041.mail.bf1.yahoo.com >> X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.117.340979 >> X-PG-Spam-Score: 2.1 (++) >> X-Mailing-List: pgsql-general > > - -- > Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com > PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201204121218 > http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > iEYEAREDAAYFAk+HAIEACgkQvJuQZxSWSsg0ugCeIFt1FsKMim6PJdGK7peHwVq2 > Yv0AoNUi95zh3BG9ejbaRHPfeqtkvWpo > =5TUn > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-www mailing list (pgsql-www@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-www -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 > You're looking at the wrong header. Our spam score gave it 2.1. Which > is still not very much, but a lot better than minus 3.6.. Oops, you are right. I think I have a -5 whitelist for the PG lists, which means it is 2.6, not that far from 2.1. Hardly one of the more disguised spams I've ever seen, so I think everyone should be doing better. - -- Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201204121502 http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEAREDAAYFAk+HJ3AACgkQvJuQZxSWSsgQkACg8SiO7yyrT5yXkv2a6vp/WpPe DX8An3Jp6svEA+wpxPFiLq3jmWrkhH55 =V5ef -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----