Thread: Re: [ADMIN] Post Removal
Rafael Domiciano <rafael.domiciano@gmail.com> wrote: > What i have to do to remove the following post: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-admin/2009-09/msg00141.php I'm not sure it is possible to have a public post removed from the archives; but if it is, pgsql-admin would probably not be read by the folks with rights to do it. I'm moving this to the pgsql-www list with a blind copy to pgsql-admin. -Kevin
On 01/17/2012 09:41 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote: > > Rafael Domiciano<rafael.domiciano@gmail.com> wrote: > >> What i have to do to remove the following post: >> >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-admin/2009-09/msg00141.php > > I'm not sure it is possible to have a public post removed from the > archives; but if it is, pgsql-admin would probably not be read by > the folks with rights to do it. I'm moving this to the pgsql-www > list with a blind copy to pgsql-admin. Nor is it even reasonable. The archives are archived all over the world by mailing list companies like noodle and markmail. JD > > -Kevin > -- Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development The PostgreSQL Conference - http://www.postgresqlconference.org/ @cmdpromptinc - @postgresconf - 509-416-6579
"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> writes: > Rafael Domiciano <rafael.domiciano@gmail.com> wrote: >> What i have to do to remove the following post: >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-admin/2009-09/msg00141.php > I'm not sure it is possible to have a public post removed from the > archives; but if it is, pgsql-admin would probably not be read by > the folks with rights to do it. I'm moving this to the pgsql-www > list with a blind copy to pgsql-admin. I believe there is a general project policy against altering the archives; they're historical records which are valuable only to the extent that they're accurate and complete. It seems a bit silly to be asking to suppress a post more than two years after the fact, anyway. Even if we did remove it, there would still be copies available from google, the Wayback Machine, etc etc. regards, tom lane