Thread: 9.1 feature matrix
I notice that 9.1's features aren't included on the feature matrix. Last time the features for 9.0 were shown during its beta stage. Is this an oversight, it's not ready yet, or are we not adding it until the final release? Thanks -- Thom Brown Twitter: @darkixion IRC (freenode): dark_ixion Registered Linux user: #516935 EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Excerpts from Thom Brown's message of mar jun 14 19:47:30 -0400 2011: > I notice that 9.1's features aren't included on the feature matrix. > Last time the features for 9.0 were shown during its beta stage. Is > this an oversight, it's not ready yet, or are we not adding it until > the final release? ... or is Stefan just too busy? -- Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
On 15 June 2011 05:47, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote: > Excerpts from Thom Brown's message of mar jun 14 19:47:30 -0400 2011: >> I notice that 9.1's features aren't included on the feature matrix. >> Last time the features for 9.0 were shown during its beta stage. Is >> this an oversight, it's not ready yet, or are we not adding it until >> the final release? > > ... or is Stefan just too busy? It needn't all fall upon Stefan surely? I wouldn't mind looking into it if it isn't already being worked on. -- Thom Brown Twitter: @darkixion IRC (freenode): dark_ixion Registered Linux user: #516935 EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:18, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote: > On 15 June 2011 05:47, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote: >> Excerpts from Thom Brown's message of mar jun 14 19:47:30 -0400 2011: >>> I notice that 9.1's features aren't included on the feature matrix. >>> Last time the features for 9.0 were shown during its beta stage. Is >>> this an oversight, it's not ready yet, or are we not adding it until >>> the final release? >> >> ... or is Stefan just too busy? > > It needn't all fall upon Stefan surely? I wouldn't mind looking into > it if it isn't already being worked on. No, it doesn't all need to fall upon Stefan. It's just that he's usually been doing it, so I think people have just been backing off to let him do it again :-) Stefan - clearly we have volunteers to help out to do it if you don't want to/have the time. Just speak up :) -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
On 15 June 2011 09:34, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:18, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote: >> On 15 June 2011 05:47, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote: >>> Excerpts from Thom Brown's message of mar jun 14 19:47:30 -0400 2011: >>>> I notice that 9.1's features aren't included on the feature matrix. >>>> Last time the features for 9.0 were shown during its beta stage. Is >>>> this an oversight, it's not ready yet, or are we not adding it until >>>> the final release? >>> >>> ... or is Stefan just too busy? >> >> It needn't all fall upon Stefan surely? I wouldn't mind looking into >> it if it isn't already being worked on. > > No, it doesn't all need to fall upon Stefan. It's just that he's > usually been doing it, so I think people have just been backing off to > let him do it again :-) Stefan - clearly we have volunteers to help > out to do it if you don't want to/have the time. Just speak up :) We haven't heard anything further on this. Is it under development? We're approaching our 3rd beta in 2 weeks so would be nice to get something up soonish. Stefan, are you still okay to do this, or would you prefer others have a go at adding it this time? -- Thom Brown Twitter: @darkixion IRC (freenode): dark_ixion Registered Linux user: #516935 EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
On 06/28/2011 04:45 PM, Thom Brown wrote: > On 15 June 2011 09:34, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:18, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote: >>> On 15 June 2011 05:47, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote: >>>> Excerpts from Thom Brown's message of mar jun 14 19:47:30 -0400 2011: >>>>> I notice that 9.1's features aren't included on the feature matrix. >>>>> Last time the features for 9.0 were shown during its beta stage. Is >>>>> this an oversight, it's not ready yet, or are we not adding it until >>>>> the final release? >>>> >>>> ... or is Stefan just too busy? >>> >>> It needn't all fall upon Stefan surely? I wouldn't mind looking into >>> it if it isn't already being worked on. >> >> No, it doesn't all need to fall upon Stefan. It's just that he's >> usually been doing it, so I think people have just been backing off to >> let him do it again :-) Stefan - clearly we have volunteers to help >> out to do it if you don't want to/have the time. Just speak up :) > > We haven't heard anything further on this. Is it under development? > We're approaching our 3rd beta in 2 weeks so would be nice to get > something up soonish. > > Stefan, are you still okay to do this, or would you prefer others have > a go at adding it this time? congratulations - you just got signed up for the task ;) - access information will be sent seperately. Note that the newly added versions will not be visible unless one of the sysadmins flips another small switch ;) Stefan