Thread: Given that 9.0.1 is out ...
... can we remove the 9.0beta and RC directories from FTP now?
-- -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com
Josh Berkus wrote: > ... can we remove the 9.0beta and RC directories from FTP now? Seems this is still not done: v9.0beta1v9.0beta2v9.0beta3v9.0beta4v9.0rc1v9.1alpha1 -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > Josh Berkus wrote: >> ... can we remove the 9.0beta and RC directories from FTP now? > > Seems this is still not done: > > v9.0beta1 > v9.0beta2 > v9.0beta3 > v9.0beta4 > v9.0rc1 > v9.1alpha1 Well, remove 9.1alpha1 wouldn't be a good idea. We could possibly remove the others, but I'm not sure we have any consensus that this is the right thing to do. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 22:10 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > > Josh Berkus wrote: > >> ... can we remove the 9.0beta and RC directories from FTP now? > > > > Seems this is still not done: > > > > v9.0beta1 > > v9.0beta2 > > v9.0beta3 > > v9.0beta4 > > v9.0rc1 > > v9.1alpha1 > > Well, remove 9.1alpha1 wouldn't be a good idea. We could possibly > remove the others, but I'm not sure we have any consensus that this is > the right thing to do. Could me as a +1 to only have stable releases. Anyone who wants and unstable release can pull from git. > > -- > Robert Haas > EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com > The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company > -- PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579 Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 3:20 AM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote: > On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 22:10 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: >> > Josh Berkus wrote: >> >> ... can we remove the 9.0beta and RC directories from FTP now? >> > >> > Seems this is still not done: >> > >> > v9.0beta1 >> > v9.0beta2 >> > v9.0beta3 >> > v9.0beta4 >> > v9.0rc1 >> > v9.1alpha1 >> >> Well, remove 9.1alpha1 wouldn't be a good idea. We could possibly >> remove the others, but I'm not sure we have any consensus that this is >> the right thing to do. > > Could me as a +1 to only have stable releases. Anyone who wants and > unstable release can pull from git. I assume you're not really saying that we shouldn't offer alpha downloads, or snapshot tarballs? -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Dave Page wrote: > On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 3:20 AM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 22:10 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > >> > Josh Berkus wrote: > >> >> ... can we remove the 9.0beta and RC directories from FTP now? > >> > > >> > Seems this is still not done: > >> > > >> > ? ? ? ?v9.0beta1 > >> > ? ? ? ?v9.0beta2 > >> > ? ? ? ?v9.0beta3 > >> > ? ? ? ?v9.0beta4 > >> > ? ? ? ?v9.0rc1 > >> > ? ? ? ?v9.1alpha1 > >> > >> Well, remove 9.1alpha1 wouldn't be a good idea. ?We could possibly > >> remove the others, but I'm not sure we have any consensus that this is > >> the right thing to do. > > > > Could me as a +1 to only have stable releases. Anyone who wants and > > unstable release can pull from git. > > I assume you're not really saying that we shouldn't offer alpha > downloads, or snapshot tarballs? I misread the alpha1 as 9.0 alpha1, so forget that item. The issue is the presence of 9.0 beta and rc downloads. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +