Thread: PostgreSQL moderation report: 2009-6-18

PostgreSQL moderation report: 2009-6-18

From
webmaster@postgresql.org
Date:
PostgreSQL.org moderation report - 2009-6-18 14:0:0.

There are 9 documentation comment(s) requiring moderation.
There are 1 event(s) requiring moderation.
There are 4 news item(s) requiring moderation.
There are 3 professional service(s) requiring moderation.

Moderators; please check and moderate these items as soon as possible!


Re: PostgreSQL moderation report: 2009-6-18

From
Josh Berkus
Date:
On 6/18/09 7:00 AM, webmaster@postgresql.org wrote:
> PostgreSQL.org moderation report - 2009-6-18 14:0:0.
>
> There are 9 documentation comment(s) requiring moderation.
> There are 1 event(s) requiring moderation.
> There are 4 news item(s) requiring moderation.
> There are 3 professional service(s) requiring moderation.
>
> Moderators; please check and moderate these items as soon as possible!
>

I like this report.  If people want it to be on Slaves, then fine.  But 
it's a useful reminder.

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
www.pgexperts.com


Re: PostgreSQL moderation report: 2009-6-18

From
Guido Barosio
Date:
+1

On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Josh Berkus<josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> On 6/18/09 7:00 AM, webmaster@postgresql.org wrote:
>>
>> PostgreSQL.org moderation report - 2009-6-18 14:0:0.
>>
>> There are 9 documentation comment(s) requiring moderation.
>> There are 1 event(s) requiring moderation.
>> There are 4 news item(s) requiring moderation.
>> There are 3 professional service(s) requiring moderation.
>>
>> Moderators; please check and moderate these items as soon as possible!
>>
>
> I like this report.  If people want it to be on Slaves, then fine.  But it's
> a useful reminder.
>
> --
> Josh Berkus
> PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
> www.pgexperts.com
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-www mailing list (pgsql-www@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-www
>


Re: PostgreSQL moderation report: 2009-6-18

From
Tom Lane
Date:
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> I like this report.  If people want it to be on Slaves, then fine.  But 
> it's a useful reminder.

Well, -slaves is where I was thinking it should go.  I guess the
question is whether any of the people it's actually meant for
are not reading -slaves.
        regards, tom lane