Thread: Another summerofcode.html update
Guys, Here it is in context patch format, to forstall confusion. Please apply, thanks. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL @ Sun San Francisco
On Tuesday 25 March 2008 12:19, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Guys,
>
> Here it is in context patch format, to forstall confusion. Please apply,
> thanks.
AFICT this was committed, but no follow-up was posted saying so... in the
future let's all remember to follow-up when we apply. Thank you for your
support.
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 > AFICT this was committed, but no follow-up was posted saying so... in the > future let's all remember to follow-up when we apply. Thank you for your > support. Isn't that what post-commit hooks automagically sending mail is for? - -- Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200803252150 http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEAREDAAYFAkfpq90ACgkQvJuQZxSWSsjWdgCfbEgkqdm9pxNV8uGaLUl5Pmvg V20AoKh36ypmstOzMIbPiD7+OQVLFIQT =lbCE -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 01:50:47 -0000 "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg@turnstep.com> wrote: > > AFICT this was committed, but no follow-up was posted saying so... > > in the future let's all remember to follow-up when we apply. Thank > > you for your support. > > Isn't that what post-commit hooks automagically sending mail is for? > Yes. I am not sure which followup we are looking for. I received notification today. Robert are you not on pgweb@pgweb.postgresql.org? Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake -- The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director | PostgreSQL political pundit
On Tuesday 25 March 2008 21:53, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 01:50:47 -0000
>
> "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg@turnstep.com> wrote:
> > > AFICT this was committed, but no follow-up was posted saying so...
> > > in the future let's all remember to follow-up when we apply. Thank
> > > you for your support.
> >
> > Isn't that what post-commit hooks automagically sending mail is for?
>
> Yes. I am not sure which followup we are looking for. I received
> notification today. Robert are you not on pgweb@pgweb.postgresql.org?
>
sure, but those messages are not threaded to original requests, and i'd
suspect not everyone who submits a patch is subscribed there.
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
Robert Treat wrote: > On Tuesday 25 March 2008 21:53, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 01:50:47 -0000 > > > > "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg@turnstep.com> wrote: > > > > AFICT this was committed, but no follow-up was posted saying > > > > so... in the future let's all remember to follow-up when we > > > > apply. Thank you for your support. > > > > > > Isn't that what post-commit hooks automagically sending mail is > > > for? > > > > Yes. I am not sure which followup we are looking for. I received > > notification today. Robert are you not on > > pgweb@pgweb.postgresql.org? > > > sure, but those messages are not threaded to original requests, and > i'd suspect not everyone who submits a patch is subscribed there. I agree with Robert here - having a quick "applied, thanks" note appear in the proper thread makes it a *lot* easier to figure out which things can be removed from the local shame-list of stuff that needs to be applied. //Magnus
On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 10:15:55 +0100 Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > I agree with Robert here - having a quick "applied, thanks" note > appear in the proper thread makes it a *lot* easier to figure out > which things can be removed from the local shame-list of stuff that > needs to be applied. With the infrequency of commits for www should we just point the commit message to -www? Joshua D. Drake > > //Magnus > -- The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director | PostgreSQL political pundit
Joshua D. Drake wrote: > On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 10:15:55 +0100 > Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > > > I agree with Robert here - having a quick "applied, thanks" note > > appear in the proper thread makes it a *lot* easier to figure out > > which things can be removed from the local shame-list of stuff that > > needs to be applied. > > With the infrequency of commits for www should we just point the > commit message to -www? I think not. It' just yet another reason that people would stay away who're more interested in the other parts of the www discussion, and it also does not solve the actual problem with the threading of the message... //Magnus