Thread: Another summerofcode.html update

Another summerofcode.html update

From
Josh Berkus
Date:
Guys,

Here it is in context patch format, to forstall confusion.  Please apply, 
thanks.

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco

Re: Another summerofcode.html update

From
Robert Treat
Date:
On Tuesday 25 March 2008 12:19, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Guys,
>
> Here it is in context patch format, to forstall confusion.  Please apply,
> thanks.

AFICT this was committed, but no follow-up was posted saying so... in the 
future let's all remember to follow-up when we apply. Thank you for your 
support. 

-- 
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL


Re: Another summerofcode.html update

From
"Greg Sabino Mullane"
Date:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160


> AFICT this was committed, but no follow-up was posted saying so... in the
> future let's all remember to follow-up when we apply. Thank you for your
> support.

Isn't that what post-commit hooks automagically sending mail is for?

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200803252150
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAkfpq90ACgkQvJuQZxSWSsjWdgCfbEgkqdm9pxNV8uGaLUl5Pmvg
V20AoKh36ypmstOzMIbPiD7+OQVLFIQT
=lbCE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Re: Another summerofcode.html update

From
"Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 01:50:47 -0000
"Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg@turnstep.com> wrote:

> > AFICT this was committed, but no follow-up was posted saying so...
> > in the future let's all remember to follow-up when we apply. Thank
> > you for your support.
>
> Isn't that what post-commit hooks automagically sending mail is for?
>

Yes. I am not sure which followup we are looking for. I received
notification today. Robert are you not on pgweb@pgweb.postgresql.org?

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

--
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director |  PostgreSQL political pundit


Re: Another summerofcode.html update

From
Robert Treat
Date:
On Tuesday 25 March 2008 21:53, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 01:50:47 -0000
>
> "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg@turnstep.com> wrote:
> > > AFICT this was committed, but no follow-up was posted saying so...
> > > in the future let's all remember to follow-up when we apply. Thank
> > > you for your support.
> >
> > Isn't that what post-commit hooks automagically sending mail is for?
>
> Yes. I am not sure which followup we are looking for. I received
> notification today. Robert are you not on pgweb@pgweb.postgresql.org?
>
sure, but those messages are not threaded to original requests, and i'd 
suspect not everyone who submits a patch is subscribed there. 

-- 
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL


Re: Another summerofcode.html update

From
Magnus Hagander
Date:
Robert Treat wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 March 2008 21:53, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 01:50:47 -0000
> >
> > "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg@turnstep.com> wrote:
> > > > AFICT this was committed, but no follow-up was posted saying
> > > > so... in the future let's all remember to follow-up when we
> > > > apply. Thank you for your support.
> > >
> > > Isn't that what post-commit hooks automagically sending mail is
> > > for?
> >
> > Yes. I am not sure which followup we are looking for. I received
> > notification today. Robert are you not on
> > pgweb@pgweb.postgresql.org?
> >
> sure, but those messages are not threaded to original requests, and
> i'd suspect not everyone who submits a patch is subscribed there. 

I agree with Robert here - having a quick "applied, thanks" note appear
in the proper thread makes it a *lot* easier to figure out which things
can be removed from the local shame-list of stuff that needs to be
applied.

//Magnus


Re: Another summerofcode.html update

From
"Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 10:15:55 +0100
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:

> I agree with Robert here - having a quick "applied, thanks" note
> appear in the proper thread makes it a *lot* easier to figure out
> which things can be removed from the local shame-list of stuff that
> needs to be applied.

With the infrequency of commits for www should we just point the commit
message to -www?

Joshua D. Drake

>
> //Magnus
>


--
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director |  PostgreSQL political pundit


Re: Another summerofcode.html update

From
Magnus Hagander
Date:
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 10:15:55 +0100
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> 
> > I agree with Robert here - having a quick "applied, thanks" note
> > appear in the proper thread makes it a *lot* easier to figure out
> > which things can be removed from the local shame-list of stuff that
> > needs to be applied.
> 
> With the infrequency of commits for www should we just point the
> commit message to -www?

I think not. It' just yet another reason that people would stay away
who're more interested in the other parts of the www discussion, and it
also does not solve the actual problem with the threading of the
message...

//Magnus