Thread: Re: [ADMIN] 8.2.4 patches? (fwd)
> > > > > Running cvs log throught src/tools/pgcvslog seems to work fine for me. > > > > > > > > Should we include this as a bz2 file stored in the release / source directory? > > > > I agree it shouldn't be in the tarball itself, but having it along side of it > > > > would be okay ... > > > > > > I would like to see it in HTML on a web site --- colorization is bonus > > > points. ;-) > > > > Huh? Bruce has realised the web is useful and popular? *shocked* > > You realize the TODO list is published in HTML, right? ;-) Yes, I wrote the conversion code to get it on the website. But I'm sure the existance of the html version is accidental in some way :p /Magnus
Magnus Hagander wrote: > > > > > > Running cvs log throught src/tools/pgcvslog seems to work fine for me. > > > > > > > > > > Should we include this as a bz2 file stored in the release / source directory? > > > > > I agree it shouldn't be in the tarball itself, but having it along side of it > > > > > would be okay ... > > > > > > > > I would like to see it in HTML on a web site --- colorization is bonus > > > > points. ;-) > > > > > > Huh? Bruce has realised the web is useful and popular? *shocked* > > > > You realize the TODO list is published in HTML, right? ;-) > > Yes, I wrote the conversion code to get it on the website. > > But I'm sure the existance of the html version is accidental in some way :p I think it would be nice to have bugs in red HTML and features in green HTML, or at least the bullets. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
Bruce Momjian wrote: > I think it would be nice to have bugs in red HTML and features in green > HTML, or at least the bullets. It would be easier if the source document were not plain text. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > I think it would be nice to have bugs in red HTML and features in green > > HTML, or at least the bullets. > > It would be easier if the source document were not plain text. I can actually do the markup easily --- the bigger problem is deciding which are features and which bugs. Do we want to make that distinction in the TODO list? ;-) -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
Bruce Momjian wrote: > Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > I think it would be nice to have bugs in red HTML and features in green > > > HTML, or at least the bullets. > > > > It would be easier if the source document were not plain text. > > I can actually do the markup easily --- the bigger problem is deciding > which are features and which bugs. Do we want to make that distinction > in the TODO list? ;-) It was _your_ suggestion, I note :-)` -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > > > I think it would be nice to have bugs in red HTML and features in green > > > > HTML, or at least the bullets. > > > > > > It would be easier if the source document were not plain text. > > > > I can actually do the markup easily --- the bigger problem is deciding > > which are features and which bugs. Do we want to make that distinction > > in the TODO list? ;-) > > It was _your_ suggestion, I note :-)` So, do we want that change? I am looking for opinions. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +