Thread: Re: [HACKERS] \dF wrt text search
On Sunday 02 September 2007 10:29, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> writes: > > postgres=# \dF > > Did not find any relation named "F". > > Works for me. When did you last recompile psql? > Blah.... I compiled last night, using the latest snapshot in the postgresql/dev/ directory in ftp, which, as I look now, has a date listed of 2007-08-10, and looking in the source the catversion is 200702251, which is before the tsearch bits hit the tree. So, I think my problems lie in the snapshot no longer being updated :-\ CCing www in case someone wants to fix it. -- Robert Treat Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> writes: > Blah.... I compiled last night, using the latest snapshot in the > postgresql/dev/ directory in ftp, which, as I look now, has a date listed of > 2007-08-10, and looking in the source the catversion is 200702251, which is > before the tsearch bits hit the tree. So, I think my problems lie in the > snapshot no longer being updated :-\ CCing www in case someone wants to fix > it. I'll bet a dollar it got broken in the master-CVS-server move. regards, tom lane
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Should be fixed now, running a manual run of it right now, give it about 15 minutes or so ... - --On Sunday, September 02, 2007 21:48:36 -0400 Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > On Sunday 02 September 2007 10:29, Tom Lane wrote: >> Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> writes: >> > postgres=# \dF >> > Did not find any relation named "F". >> >> Works for me. When did you last recompile psql? >> > > Blah.... I compiled last night, using the latest snapshot in the > postgresql/dev/ directory in ftp, which, as I look now, has a date listed of > 2007-08-10, and looking in the source the catversion is 200702251, which is > before the tsearch bits hit the tree. So, I think my problems lie in the > snapshot no longer being updated :-\ CCing www in case someone wants to fix > it. > > -- > Robert Treat > Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster - ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFG228F4QvfyHIvDvMRAoYrAJ0b3cg+Jp0lKI6dw2nkQuwoIpE6XwCfQYEG 6EZdIJghysELcvIrdtoisV8= =EXzk -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 09:57:16PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> writes: > > Blah.... I compiled last night, using the latest snapshot in the > > postgresql/dev/ directory in ftp, which, as I look now, has a date listed of > > 2007-08-10, and looking in the source the catversion is 200702251, which is > > before the tsearch bits hit the tree. So, I think my problems lie in the > > snapshot no longer being updated :-\ CCing www in case someone wants to fix > > it. > > I'll bet a dollar it got broken in the master-CVS-server move. I thought it worked off the same cvs repo as the cvsweb stuff (on svr1), which AFAIK isn't broken (since cvsweb works). But it's not documented anywhere, and I do recall not being able to track down exactly how it worked, so I won't be able to proove it to the point of being able to collect that dollar ;-) //Magnus
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 11:18:45PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > Should be fixed now, running a manual run of it right now, give it about 15 > minutes or so ... Is there now monitoring for it as well? -- Decibel!, aka Jim Nasby decibel@decibel.org EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
Decibel! wrote: > On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 11:18:45PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: >> Should be fixed now, running a manual run of it right now, give it about 15 >> minutes or so ... > > Is there now monitoring for it as well? yes Stefan