Thread: Re: [webmaster] http://www.postgresql.org/support/professional_hosting_europe
Re: [webmaster] http://www.postgresql.org/support/professional_hosting_europe
From
Robert Treat
Date:
On Monday 11 December 2006 07:07, it was written:
> You list HOSPES as a hosting provider in Poland that provides PostgreSQL
> database for hosting. Do you realise their offer does not cover any of the
> current releases and thus they offer only old, outdated and insecure
> version from the 7.4.x branch.
> I think it's not a worthy hosting.
So I am going to invent policy that we'll list anyone who offers hosting on a
version we link to from the main postgresql.org web page, which means these
guys are ok for now. Any objections?
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 12:52 -0500, Robert Treat wrote:
> On Monday 11 December 2006 07:07, it was written:
> > You list HOSPES as a hosting provider in Poland that provides PostgreSQL
> > database for hosting. Do you realise their offer does not cover any of the
> > current releases and thus they offer only old, outdated and insecure
> > version from the 7.4.x branch.
> > I think it's not a worthy hosting.
>
> So I am going to invent policy that we'll list anyone who offers hosting on a
> version we link to from the main postgresql.org web page, which means these
> guys are ok for now. Any objections?
How about just a disclaimer that says:
PostgreSQL.Org does not endorse or otherwise know of the quality of the
below hosting providers. We are providing these links as information
only.
Joshua D. Drake
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
How about also requiring a list of support versions?
- --On Tuesday, December 12, 2006 12:52:54 -0500 Robert Treat
<xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> On Monday 11 December 2006 07:07, it was written:
>> You list HOSPES as a hosting provider in Poland that provides PostgreSQL
>> database for hosting. Do you realise their offer does not cover any of the
>> current releases and thus they offer only old, outdated and insecure
>> version from the 7.4.x branch.
>> I think it's not a worthy hosting.
>
> So I am going to invent policy that we'll list anyone who offers hosting on a
> version we link to from the main postgresql.org web page, which means these
> guys are ok for now. Any objections?
>
> --
> Robert Treat
> Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFFgi6H4QvfyHIvDvMRAkgbAJ0clyPMYKYpv4qjduHWcM93Ns5xiACgn9IF
DLUX0+SwJGDwPYO7uAXy4/o=
=Xh/u
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
We need a proper way for them to *update* that before we do that -
otherwise, nobody would be listing 8.2.
The solutino for this is of course to integrate it with community
logins, just not done yet.
//Magnus
>
> How about also requiring a list of support versions?
>
> - --On Tuesday, December 12, 2006 12:52:54 -0500 Robert Treat
> <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>
> > On Monday 11 December 2006 07:07, it was written:
> >> You list HOSPES as a hosting provider in Poland that provides PostgreSQL
> >> database for hosting. Do you realise their offer does not cover any of the
> >> current releases and thus they offer only old, outdated and insecure
> >> version from the 7.4.x branch.
> >> I think it's not a worthy hosting.
> >
> > So I am going to invent policy that we'll list anyone who offers hosting on a
> > version we link to from the main postgresql.org web page, which means these
> > guys are ok for now. Any objections?
> >
> > --
> > Robert Treat
> > Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
>
>
>
> - ----
> Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
> Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org
> Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)
>
> iD8DBQFFgi6H4QvfyHIvDvMRAkgbAJ0clyPMYKYpv4qjduHWcM93Ns5xiACgn9IF
> DLUX0+SwJGDwPYO7uAXy4/o=
> =Xh/u
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
- --On Friday, December 15, 2006 10:47:42 +0100 Magnus Hagander
<magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>
> We need a proper way for them to *update* that before we do that -
> otherwise, nobody would be listing 8.2.
Well, nobody would be listing anything, since it isn't there at all that I
could see ... :)
>
> The solutino for this is of course to integrate it with community
> logins, just not done yet.
>
> //Magnus
>
>>
>> How about also requiring a list of support versions?
>>
>> - --On Tuesday, December 12, 2006 12:52:54 -0500 Robert Treat
>> <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>>
>> > On Monday 11 December 2006 07:07, it was written:
>> >> You list HOSPES as a hosting provider in Poland that provides PostgreSQL
>> >> database for hosting. Do you realise their offer does not cover any of the
>> >> current releases and thus they offer only old, outdated and insecure
>> >> version from the 7.4.x branch.
>> >> I think it's not a worthy hosting.
>> >
>> > So I am going to invent policy that we'll list anyone who offers hosting
>> > on a version we link to from the main postgresql.org web page, which means
>> > these guys are ok for now. Any objections?
>> >
>> > --
>> > Robert Treat
>> > Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
>>
>>
>>
>> - ----
>> Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
>> Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org
>> Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)
>>
>> iD8DBQFFgi6H4QvfyHIvDvMRAkgbAJ0clyPMYKYpv4qjduHWcM93Ns5xiACgn9IF
>> DLUX0+SwJGDwPYO7uAXy4/o=
>> =Xh/u
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>>
>> http://archives.postgresql.org
- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFFgnGn4QvfyHIvDvMRAq5KAJ9AnBP1W1aceCfIPBzE3+O5jtPTiwCgw4pu
zqATvgYZl8kh+B6nzn4LLFs=
=Ev+T
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 05:57:58AM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > We need a proper way for them to *update* that before we do that - > > otherwise, nobody would be listing 8.2. > > Well, nobody would be listing anything, since it isn't there at all that I > could see ... :) Eh, ok, good point, we only have interfaces. I used to have that. Likely I took it out pending the ability to edit it :-) So then we need two things - ability to edit, and add a field. I still don't want to add the field before we have the functionality to edit it. //Magnus