Thread: Is archives working for August?
I just searched the PostgreSQL archives for 'packages' sorted by date: http://search.postgresql.org/archives.search?cs=utf-8&fm=on&dt=back&q=packages&ul=http%3A%2F%2Farchives.postgresql.org%2F%25&dp=0&o=0&ps=20&s=date The first item is July, not August, even though there was a posting yesterday about packages: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-08/msg00384.php Are archives working properly? I searched proposal and that still didn't work. -- Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
Uh, this still is not working. Can someone else confirm the failure? --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bruce Momjian wrote: > I just searched the PostgreSQL archives for 'packages' sorted by date: > > http://search.postgresql.org/archives.search?cs=utf-8&fm=on&dt=back&q=packages&ul=http%3A%2F%2Farchives.postgresql.org%2F%25&dp=0&o=0&ps=20&s=date > > The first item is July, not August, even though there was a posting > yesterday about packages: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-08/msg00384.php > > Are archives working properly? I searched proposal and that still > didn't work. -- Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
Bruce Momjian wrote: > Uh, this still is not working. Can someone else confirm the failure? > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Bruce Momjian wrote: >> I just searched the PostgreSQL archives for 'packages' sorted by date: >> >> http://search.postgresql.org/archives.search?cs=utf-8&fm=on&dt=back&q=packages&ul=http%3A%2F%2Farchives.postgresql.org%2F%25&dp=0&o=0&ps=20&s=date >> >> The first item is July, not August, even though there was a posting I can confirm this behavior. However I have not confirmed that it is the archives versus the search engine. Search may not have indexed it yet. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Uh, this still is not working. Can someone else confirm the failure? > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Bruce Momjian wrote: > >> I just searched the PostgreSQL archives for 'packages' sorted by date: > >> > >> http://search.postgresql.org/archives.search?cs=utf-8&fm=on&dt=back&q=packages&ul=http%3A%2F%2Farchives.postgresql.org%2F%25&dp=0&o=0&ps=20&s=date > >> > >> The first item is July, not August, even though there was a posting > > I can confirm this behavior. However I have not confirmed that it is the > archives versus the search engine. Search may not have indexed it yet. But the posting is from August 7: * From: "Pavel Stehule" <pavel ( dot ) stehule ( at ) hotmail ( dot ) com> * To: pgsql-hackers ( at ) postgresql ( dot ) org * Subject: proposal for PL packages for 8.3. * Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 11:44:42 +0200 Certainly our delay for indexing isn't four days. -- Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
>>>> The first item is July, not August, even though there was a posting >> I can confirm this behavior. However I have not confirmed that it is the >> archives versus the search engine. Search may not have indexed it yet. > > But the posting is from August 7: > > * From: "Pavel Stehule" <pavel ( dot ) stehule ( at ) hotmail ( dot ) com> > * To: pgsql-hackers ( at ) postgresql ( dot ) org > * Subject: proposal for PL packages for 8.3. > * Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 11:44:42 +0200 > > Certainly our delay for indexing isn't four days. I don't know :) I was just saying that I haven't confirmed it. I do not like to make assumptions. Sinceerely, Joshua D. Drake -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/