Thread: Please replace foundations. server ...
Marc, Can we have another pointer to what used to be foundation.postgresql.org? Given that we are a multi-foundation group, I think the new URL should be spi.postgresql.org. The FG needs a place to take votes and exchange documents. Thanks! Server should be the same as conference.postgresql.org. -- --Josh Josh Berkus PostgreSQL @ Sun San Francisco
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006, Josh Berkus wrote: > Marc, > > Can we have another pointer to what used to be foundation.postgresql.org? > Given that we are a multi-foundation group, I think the new URL should be > spi.postgresql.org. The FG needs a place to take votes and exchange > documents. Thanks! 'k, just to confirm: remove foundation.postgreql.org, add spi.postgresql.org and point that to conference.postgresql.org? ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
Point it to 65.19.161.16 (same IP as conference.) Thanks! On Aug 7, 2006, at 7:51 PM, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Mon, 7 Aug 2006, Josh Berkus wrote: > >> Marc, >> >> Can we have another pointer to what used to be >> foundation.postgresql.org? >> Given that we are a multi-foundation group, I think the new URL >> should be >> spi.postgresql.org. The FG needs a place to take votes and exchange >> documents. Thanks! > > 'k, just to confirm: remove foundation.postgreql.org, add > spi.postgresql.org and point that to conference.postgresql.org? > > ---- > Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http:// > www.hub.org) > Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . > scrappy@hub.org > Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 > > ---------------------------(end of > broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that > your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Mon, 7 Aug 2006, Josh Berkus wrote: > >> Marc, >> >> Can we have another pointer to what used to be foundation.postgresql.org? >> Given that we are a multi-foundation group, I think the new URL should be >> spi.postgresql.org. The FG needs a place to take votes and exchange >> documents. Thanks! > > 'k, just to confirm: remove foundation.postgreql.org, add > spi.postgresql.org and point that to conference.postgresql.org? I am not going to raise a fuss, but I would really prefer either foundation. or fundsgroup. spi is kind of incorrect although I can see the reason for the choice. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > > ---- > Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) > Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org > Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly > -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
On Monday 07 August 2006 23:20, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > On Mon, 7 Aug 2006, Josh Berkus wrote: > >> Marc, > >> > >> Can we have another pointer to what used to be > >> foundation.postgresql.org? Given that we are a multi-foundation group, I > >> think the new URL should be spi.postgresql.org. The FG needs a place > >> to take votes and exchange documents. Thanks! > > You're apparently more optimistic about the current proposed voting structure than I am ;-) > > 'k, just to confirm: remove foundation.postgreql.org, add > > spi.postgresql.org and point that to conference.postgresql.org? > > I am not going to raise a fuss, but I would really prefer either > foundation. or fundsgroup. > > spi is kind of incorrect although I can see the reason for the choice. > I have this vaugue recollection from the pg summit that we we're going to add a top level menu item into the postgresql.org website for "foundation" with information about the various foundations and sponsors / donors; and foundation.postgresql.org was going to point to that. Is that getting tossed out the window? -- Robert Treat Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
>> > > I have this vaugue recollection from the pg summit that we we're going to add > a top level menu item into the postgresql.org website for "foundation" with > information about the various foundations and sponsors / donors; and > foundation.postgresql.org was going to point to that. Is that getting tossed > out the window? I think that /foundation should be a flat representation of who and what the funds group is. Where foundation. , or funds. should be a place where we can collaborate. I do not like spi. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
Josh, > Where foundation. , or funds. should be a place where we can > collaborate. > > I do not like spi. Well, foundation. is out because SPI is not the only foundation for PostgreSQL. funds. sounds less official, I could go with that, but I don't see what's wrong with spi. -- --Josh Josh Berkus PostgreSQL @ Sun San Francisco
Josh Berkus wrote: > Josh, > >> Where foundation. , or funds. should be a place where we can >> collaborate. >> >> I do not like spi. > > Well, foundation. is out because SPI is not the only foundation for > PostgreSQL. funds. sounds less official, I could go with that, but I > don't see what's wrong with spi. > It just feels weird :) spi.postgresql.org says to me oh this is the spi website on postgresql. And if foundation is out, spi would be out too because its not the only foundation. funds is definitely less official and I am open to any ideas. And I am not trying to raise a fuss :) if that is all we have it is all we have. What about fundsgroup or even fundraising. ? Joshua D. Drake -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Yeah, spi won't work. Funds sounds a little odd. Not sure why foundation cannot work - if we have more than one foundation, list them all under that subdomain. Most other projects seem to be using foundation.project.org or project.org/foundation. Some have donate.project.org and project.org/donations. - -- Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200608091755 http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFE2lqYvJuQZxSWSsgRAij9AJwI6PQvTkyOpJbdO3SSYlag5hXxkACgo8cr cmkUrJYGbQxvVd4ciloYUXY= =vwSe -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Greg, > Yeah, spi won't work. Funds sounds a little odd. Not sure why > foundation cannot work - if we have more than one foundation, > list them all under that subdomain. Most other projects seem > to be using foundation.project.org or project.org/foundation. > Some have donate.project.org and project.org/donations. This is for a different purpose. This is specificially a URL for the Framewerk instance which the Funds Group (SPI) uses for collaboration. It's not for general donation information, which I presume would go under www.postgresql.org/about/donate. -- --Josh Josh Berkus PostgreSQL @ Sun San Francisco
Josh Berkus wrote: > Greg, > >> Yeah, spi won't work. Funds sounds a little odd. Not sure why >> foundation cannot work - if we have more than one foundation, >> list them all under that subdomain. Most other projects seem >> to be using foundation.project.org or project.org/foundation. >> Some have donate.project.org and project.org/donations. > > This is for a different purpose. This is specificially a URL for the > Framewerk instance which the Funds Group (SPI) uses for collaboration. > It's not for general donation information, which I presume would go under > www.postgresql.org/about/donate. Lets just do fundraising.postgresql.org That is what we are, the Fundraising Group right? At least to me, SPI is just syntactical sugar to allow us to operate. I think we should keep the domain relevant to the group itself. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
Josh, > Lets just do fundraising.postgresql.org I'm good with that. -- --Josh Josh Berkus PostgreSQL @ Sun San Francisco
On Wednesday 09 August 2006 18:47, Josh Berkus wrote: > Josh, > > > Lets just do fundraising.postgresql.org > > I'm good with that. Why don't we just stick with thepostgresqlfoundation.org (or whatever it is/was) for the collaboration site? Especially if the PR / Enquiring minds will all be pointed to postgresql.org/foundation anyway... -- Robert Treat Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL