Thread: Why is April 21 listed twice in the pgsql-general web archive?
Why is April 21 listed twice in the pgsql-general web archive? http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2006-04/index.php
On Friday 21 April 2006 11:00, Jeff Amiel wrote: > Why is April 21 listed twice in the pgsql-general web archive? > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2006-04/index.php > looks like there is a glitch with whichever date shows up at the top of a given page. If you browse through the month of april, you'll see this happens on a number of different days always appearing at the top of each page. Dave/Marc... any thoughts? -- Robert Treat Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> writes:
> looks like there is a glitch with whichever date shows up at the top of a
> given page. If you browse through the month of april, you'll see this happens
> on a number of different days always appearing at the top of each page.
The other problem that the archive pages have had since forever is the
tendency to show a few garbage "[no subject]" entries near the top of
the newest page for a list. These always point to what seem to be
partial messages. I do not know if this represents the archiving
process storing bad data, or the web page generator misinterpreting
what's stored.
regards, tom lane
On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 12:12:10PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > The other problem that the archive pages have had since forever is the > tendency to show a few garbage "[no subject]" entries near the top of > the newest page for a list. These always point to what seem to be > partial messages. I do not know if this represents the archiving > process storing bad data, or the web page generator misinterpreting > what's stored. I investigated this several months ago and suggested a possible cause: that a paragraph beginning with "From " is being parsed as the beginning of a new message. http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-www/2006-02/msg00083.php -- Michael Fuhr