Thread: Re: [PATCHES] aclchk.c refactor

Re: [PATCHES] aclchk.c refactor

From
Tom Lane
Date:
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> I applied this patch yesterday, but I did not receive the commit
> message.  However I do see it in the online archives.

> Is there something fishy going on here, or just the mail was lost on its
> way here?

[ checks mail logs... ]  Hm, I never got a copy of this either:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2005-11/msg00609.php

There's definitely something flaky about pgsql-committers since the
server move.  I still haven't seen anything about Michael's ecpg commits
of yesterday, either.

            regards, tom lane

Re: [PATCHES] aclchk.c refactor

From
"Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Everything should be good now ... had to change Michael and Niel over, and
just approved through their commits also ...



On Thu, 1 Dec 2005, Tom Lane wrote:

> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
>> I applied this patch yesterday, but I did not receive the commit
>> message.  However I do see it in the online archives.
>
>> Is there something fishy going on here, or just the mail was lost on its
>> way here?
>
> [ checks mail logs... ]  Hm, I never got a copy of this either:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2005-11/msg00609.php
>
> There's definitely something flaky about pgsql-committers since the
> server move.  I still haven't seen anything about Michael's ecpg commits
> of yesterday, either.
>
>             regards, tom lane
>
>

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664