Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Thread: Runaway zope on svr2?

Runaway zope on svr2?

From
"Magnus Hagander"
Date:
There is a zope process running there at about 90% CPU usage, which
appears to have been pegged there for quite a whlie - it's used up 7500
hours of CPU time since Oct 24th. Somebody who knows about that one
mshould probably look into that one ASAP :-)

It's used for techdocsl, but it certainly shouldn't look like that...

//Magnus

Re: Runaway zope on svr2?

From
"Magnus Hagander"
Date:
Got it restarted, but we should probalby keep an extra eye on it.

//Magnus

>
> There is a zope process running there at about 90% CPU usage,
> which appears to have been pegged there for quite a whlie -
> it's used up 7500 hours of CPU time since Oct 24th. Somebody
> who knows about that one mshould probably look into that one ASAP :-)
>
> It's used for techdocsl, but it certainly shouldn't look like that...
>
> //Magnus
>
>

Re: Runaway zope on svr2?

From
Robert Bernier
Date:
On Monday 31 October 2005 14:10, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> There is a zope process running there at about 90% CPU usage, which
> appears to have been pegged there for quite a whlie - it's used up 7500
> hours of CPU time since Oct 24th. Somebody who knows about that one
> mshould probably look into that one ASAP :-)
>
> It's used for techdocsl, but it certainly shouldn't look like that...
>

I think I have this wrong but wasn't there a php exploit recently reported that affected zope? Can somebody clarify
this?

cheers

Robert

Re: Runaway zope on svr2?

From
Tino Wildenhain
Date:
Am Montag, den 31.10.2005, 20:19 +0100 schrieb Magnus Hagander:
> Got it restarted, but we should probalby keep an extra eye on it.

Which version? Need help?

Greets
Tino

Re: Runaway zope on svr2?

From
"Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, Robert Bernier wrote:

> On Monday 31 October 2005 14:10, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> There is a zope process running there at about 90% CPU usage, which
>> appears to have been pegged there for quite a whlie - it's used up 7500
>> hours of CPU time since Oct 24th. Somebody who knows about that one
>> mshould probably look into that one ASAP :-)
>>
>> It's used for techdocsl, but it certainly shouldn't look like that...
>>
>
> I think I have this wrong but wasn't there a php exploit recently
> reported that affected zope? Can somebody clarify this?

Details ... you do know that Zope is Python, not PHP, right?  I'd *really*
love to see that exploit though :)

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664