Thread: www.postgresql.org page change?
Hi all! Looking at www.postgresql.org, it seems the page changed! It looks like the advocacy page, except the images are broken. What's up? Plus there's no links to the docs, which is kinda inconvenient. Michael Glaesemann grzm myrealbox com
Looks like the old page is back. Must have been a momentary lapse. On Jul 14, 2004, at 9:00 PM, Michael Glaesemann wrote: > Hi all! > > Looking at www.postgresql.org, it seems the page changed! It looks > like the advocacy page, except the images are broken. What's up? Plus > there's no links to the docs, which is kinda inconvenient. > > > Michael Glaesemann > grzm myrealbox com > > > ---------------------------(end of > broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if > your > joining column's datatypes do not match > > Michael Glaesemann grzm myrealbox com
Looks fine to me from here at 11am ADT ... all images load up too ... On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, Michael Glaesemann wrote: > Hi all! > > Looking at www.postgresql.org, it seems the page changed! It looks like the > advocacy page, except the images are broken. What's up? Plus there's no links > to the docs, which is kinda inconvenient. > > > Michael Glaesemann > grzm myrealbox com > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your > joining column's datatypes do not match > ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
On Jul 14, 2004, at 10:59 PM, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > Looks fine to me from here at 11am ADT ... all images load up too ... > > On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, Michael Glaesemann wrote: > >> Hi all! >> >> Looking at www.postgresql.org, it seems the page changed! It looks >> like the advocacy page, except the images are broken. What's up? Plus >> there's no links to the docs, which is kinda inconvenient. I'm not sure what happened, but the server was definitely serving up a different page for at least a couple of minutes. One person brought it up in #postgresql on freenode, and then I and another person verified that it was different. (Screenshots from two different machines available if you want.) I don't know what happened. I'm just glad it seems to have reverted itself :) Regards, Michael Glaesemann grzm myrealbox com
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, Michael Glaesemann wrote: > > On Jul 14, 2004, at 10:59 PM, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > >> Looks fine to me from here at 11am ADT ... all images load up too ... >> >> On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, Michael Glaesemann wrote: >> >>> Hi all! >>> >>> Looking at www.postgresql.org, it seems the page changed! It looks like >>> the advocacy page, except the images are broken. What's up? Plus there's >>> no links to the docs, which is kinda inconvenient. > > I'm not sure what happened, but the server was definitely serving up a > different page for at least a couple of minutes. One person brought it up in > #postgresql on freenode, and then I and another person verified that it was > different. (Screenshots from two different machines available if you want.) I > don't know what happened. I'm just glad it seems to have reverted itself :) If it ever happens again, can you confirm the IP? I just checked the server, and the httpd process itself hasn't been restarted since July 3rd, and I just got into the office, so it isn't something that I did (or fixed) ... Dave, did you do anything to fix it? Now, if you say it came up with the advocacy page ... the way that apache works is if you happen to go in via IP, it will reply with the first virtual host in its config file ... which happens to be advocacy.postgresql.org ... but I don't know why, if you went in via name, it would do that ... and, just checked, and the last time that file was modified was "Feb 17 12:41" ... As far as I know, it doesn't even rely on reverse DNS for anything (or, forward, for that matter), as the way I understand it, the browser sends the 'hostname' down the stream to tell the web server which virtual host to do ... which is why some of the older browsers wouldn't work with virtual named hosts, since they didn't know to send that information down ... Anyone else here know more then I do about this sort of thing? Oleg? ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
> -----Original Message----- > From: pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org > [mailto:pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Marc G. Fournier > Sent: 14 July 2004 15:22 > To: Michael Glaesemann > Cc: Marc G. Fournier; pgsql-www@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] www.postgresql.org page change? > > If it ever happens again, can you confirm the IP? I just > checked the server, and the httpd process itself hasn't been > restarted since July 3rd, and I just got into the office, so > it isn't something that I did (or > fixed) ... Dave, did you do anything to fix it? Nope, not a thing. I checked it and it all looked OK to me. At a guess your browser didn't pick up the stylesheet for some reason - I've seen that happen before; refresh normally cures it.... /F
On Jul 14, 2004, at 11:22 PM, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, Michael Glaesemann wrote: > > If it ever happens again, can you confirm the IP? Will do! :) Michael Glaesemann grzm myrealbox com
On Jul 14, 2004, at 11:43 PM, Dave Page wrote: > Nope, not a thing. I checked it and it all looked OK to me. At a guess > your browser didn't pick up the stylesheet for some reason - I've seen > that happen before; refresh normally cures it.... It definitely wasn't that. The page had completely different *content*, not just a lack of styling. Looks like it was hiccup of some sort. Michael Glaesemann grzm myrealbox com
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Michael Glaesemann wrote: > > On Jul 14, 2004, at 11:43 PM, Dave Page wrote: >> Nope, not a thing. I checked it and it all looked OK to me. At a guess >> your browser didn't pick up the stylesheet for some reason - I've seen >> that happen before; refresh normally cures it.... > > It definitely wasn't that. The page had completely different *content*, not > just a lack of styling. Looks like it was hiccup of some sort. You mentioned advocacy ... if you look at http://advocacy.postgresql.org, is it that? Or only looked like it? ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
On Jul 15, 2004, at 12:22 AM, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > You mentioned advocacy ... if you look at > http://advocacy.postgresql.org, is it that? Or only looked like it? Here's a screenshot I took. Just to clarify something you were wondering before, yes, I entered this as a domain name, rather than an IP address. (I'm not even sure what the IP address is :) http://www.grzm.com/postgresql_org/www.postgresql.org.png It definitely looks like the advocacy page to me. I tried a link or two: they worked as far as I could tell. Michael Glaesemann grzm myrealbox com
