Thread: progress update, some questions
Greetings. I almost finished the work on user-level form submits (surveys, bugs, doc comments, events and news) and have a few questions. 1) Is 'active' field in 'events' table really needed? Maybe just consider the events with end date in the future as valid? 2) Bug submit through the website just increments some sequence but the bug itself is not stored in the database. Is this the expected behaviour? What came out of a lengthy discussion about a "real" bug tracker? 3) There is *no* moderation at all for the doc comments, I suppose? You know why PHP's have such a good signal-to-noise ratio? Here is the reason: http://lists.php.net/group.php?group=php.notes
> -----Original Message----- > From: Alexey Borzov [mailto:borz_off@cs.msu.su] > Sent: 21 April 2004 13:34 > To: pgsql-www@postgresql.org > Subject: [pgsql-www] progress update, some questions > > Greetings. > > I almost finished the work on user-level form submits > (surveys, bugs, doc comments, events and news) and have a few > questions. > > 1) Is 'active' field in 'events' table really needed? Maybe > just consider the events with end date in the future as valid? No, that field is now obsolete. > 2) Bug submit through the website just increments some > sequence but the bug itself is not stored in the database. Is > this the expected behaviour? What came out of a lengthy > discussion about a "real" bug tracker? Yes, that is the intended behaviour for the moment. > 3) There is *no* moderation at all for the doc comments, I > suppose? You know why PHP's have such a good signal-to-noise > ratio? Here is the > reason: http://lists.php.net/group.php?group=php.notes There is no moderation, though I believe some of the docs guys go through them before any releases to incorporate anything useful. Feel free to add some moderation if you like - an email to the list with a link to an 'approve' script in /admin would do the job I guess. Regards Dave.
On Wednesday 21 April 2004 08:53, Dave Page wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Alexey Borzov [mailto:borz_off@cs.msu.su] > > 3) There is *no* moderation at all for the doc comments, I > > suppose? You know why PHP's have such a good signal-to-noise > > ratio? Here is the > > reason: http://lists.php.net/group.php?group=php.notes > > There is no moderation, though I believe some of the docs guys go > through them before any releases to incorporate anything useful. > > Feel free to add some moderation if you like - an email to the list with > a link to an 'approve' script in /admin would do the job I guess. > Something I've been thinking of adding to our current admin stuff is an automatic email of actual approvals of news/events; I see they do something similar on the php docs by emailing out any changes, I'd really like to have that feature included if we add moderation tech to our docs. Robert Treat -- Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
Hi! Robert Treat wrote: >>>3) There is *no* moderation at all for the doc comments, I >>>suppose? You know why PHP's have such a good signal-to-noise >>>ratio? Here is the >>>reason: http://lists.php.net/group.php?group=php.notes >> >>There is no moderation, though I believe some of the docs guys go >>through them before any releases to incorporate anything useful. >> >>Feel free to add some moderation if you like - an email to the list with >>a link to an 'approve' script in /admin would do the job I guess. > > Something I've been thinking of adding to our current admin stuff is an > automatic email of actual approvals of news/events; I see they do something > similar on the php docs by emailing out any changes, I'd really like to have > that feature included if we add moderation tech to our docs. Before I actually start working on admin pages: what exactly do you want sent to the list? 1) News items/events added (like it is done now). 2) Approvals of news/events (automatically, unlike now). 3) Added doc comments. 4) Approved/deleted doc comments.
On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 16:15, Alexey Borzov wrote:
> Before I actually start working on admin pages: what exactly do you want sent to
> the list?
> 1) News items/events added (like it is done now).
> 2) Approvals of news/events (automatically, unlike now).
definitely we need the above two
> 3) Added doc comments.
> 4) Approved/deleted doc comments.
The only concern I would have about these would be to make sure that we
have enough qualified people to handle these appropriatly here. Peter,
you do a lot of the doc oriented stuff, do you have any input on the
above two? Would it be better if they went to the docs list?
Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
Hi! Robert Treat wrote: >>3) Added doc comments. >>4) Approved/deleted doc comments. > > The only concern I would have about these would be to make sure that we > have enough qualified people to handle these appropriatly here. Peter, > you do a lot of the doc oriented stuff, do you have any input on the > above two? Would it be better if they went to the docs list? BTW, in such a case there will immediately be a need to give different access rights to different people...