Thread: Archives cleaned up ... but not regenerated yet ...
'k, I just went through the .resource file for mhonarc and tried to clean up everything that I could, as well as move everything possible out of the msg's file itself and into include'd php files ... I'm still going through and cleaning up some stuff, but take a look at: http://archives.postgresql.org/dev and let me know if something appears off ... I *think* I've covered off the various suggests made (re: last-modified, noindex, "end of" html tags, etc) ... but, I'm bound to have missed something ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
Marc, > and let me know if something appears off ... I *think* I've covered off > the various suggests made (re: last-modified, noindex, "end of" html tags, > etc) ... but, I'm bound to have missed something ... Hmmm .... what am I looking for? Seems to work fine, so far. -- -Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco
On Sun, 1 Feb 2004, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Marc,
>
> > and let me know if something appears off ... I *think* I've covered off
> > the various suggests made (re: last-modified, noindex, "end of" html tags,
> > etc) ... but, I'm bound to have missed something ...
>
> Hmmm .... what am I looking for? Seems to work fine, so far.
Those that have been complaining about "bugs" will know :)
ie. Oleg didn't like the last-modified date (should be posting date now)
Dave wanted the noindex tags, which I think I've added where needed
TomL always vetched at me to fix the end of tag html tags (ie. </LI>)
Its more the HTML side of things then the rendered that I'm working on
cleaning up ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
Marc or Dave,
is there possibility to sort search results not by relevance, but date ?
Since there is no possibility to restrict date range, sometimes sorting
by date is much better ! For example,
try search 'better configuration options for sort memory' (january-febraury
thread) and you'll see very bad result list (this is also question to
aspseek ranking function !) even if you restrict mailing list to -hackers.
May be indices are out of date ?
Oleg
On Sun, 1 Feb 2004, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Feb 2004, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
> > Marc,
> >
> > > and let me know if something appears off ... I *think* I've covered off
> > > the various suggests made (re: last-modified, noindex, "end of" html tags,
> > > etc) ... but, I'm bound to have missed something ...
> >
> > Hmmm .... what am I looking for? Seems to work fine, so far.
>
> Those that have been complaining about "bugs" will know :)
>
> ie. Oleg didn't like the last-modified date (should be posting date now)
> Dave wanted the noindex tags, which I think I've added where needed
> TomL always vetched at me to fix the end of tag html tags (ie. </LI>)
>
> Its more the HTML side of things then the rendered that I'm working on
> cleaning up ...
>
> ----
> Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
> Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
>
Regards,
Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet,
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia)
Internet: oleg@sai.msu.su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83
> -----Original Message----- > From: Oleg Bartunov [mailto:oleg@sai.msu.su] > Sent: 02 February 2004 13:13 > To: Marc G. Fournier > Cc: Josh Berkus; pgsql-www@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Archives cleaned up ... but not > regenerated yet ... > > Marc or Dave, > > is there possibility to sort search results not by relevance, > but date ? > Since there is no possibility to restrict date range, > sometimes sorting by date is much better ! For example, try > search 'better configuration options for sort memory' > (january-febraury > thread) and you'll see very bad result list (this is also > question to aspseek ranking function !) even if you restrict > mailing list to -hackers. This is possible - as I said last week I just haven't added the date options to the forms yet... The options supported if you want to play are (just add them to the URL): dt=back | er | range Type of time limit. See below. dp=date If 'dt' is 'back', that means you want to limit result to recent pages, so you specify that "recentness" in date value, that is specified in the form xxxA[yyyB...], there xxx, yyy are numbers (which can also be negative), and A, B can be one of the following (the letters below are the same as in strptime(3) and strftime(3) functions): Character Meaning ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------- s second M minute h hour d day m month y year Examples of values for dp parameter: String Meaning Value, s 4h30m 2 hours and 30 minutes 16200 1Y6m-15d 1 year and six month minus 15 days 45792000 1h-60M+1s 1 hour minus 60 minutes plus 1 second 1 Note that ASPseek do not use minutes and seconds of document's last modification date, so specifying something more precise than hour is useless (but still allowed). dx=1 | -1 If dt is er (which is short for newer/older), that means the search will be limited to pages newer or older than date given. Parameter dx is newer/older flag, value 1 means "newer" or "after", and value -1 means "older" or "before". The actual date is separated into dd, dm, dy fields as follows. dd=number Day of month (1...31) dm=number Month (0 - January, 1 - February, .., 11 - December) dy=number Year (four digits, for example 2001) db=dd/mm/yyyy de=dd/mm/yyyy If dt is range, that means search within given range of dates. Parameters db and de are used in this case and stands for beginning and ending date, respectively. Each date is in the form dd/mm/yyyy, there dd is day of month number (1...31), mm is month number (1...12), and yyyy is four-digits year. fr=value to=value These parameters are passed to s.cgi in subsequent search pages; they contains date and time in internal format used by s.cgi. Regards, Dave.
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org> writes: > TomL always vetched at me to fix the end of tag html tags (ie. </LI>) Well, on that front, http://archives.postgresql.org/dev/ renders fine in Netscape 4.7, but the search-results page comes up dead blank (and has for the past week or so). I suppose it's ye same olde problem of missing table end tags. regards, tom lane
> -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us] > Sent: 02 February 2004 14:46 > To: Marc G. Fournier > Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Archives cleaned up ... but not > regenerated yet ... > > "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org> writes: > > TomL always vetched at me to fix the end of tag html tags (ie. > > </LI>) > > Well, on that front, http://archives.postgresql.org/dev/ > renders fine in Netscape 4.7, but the search-results page > comes up dead blank (and has for the past week or so). I > suppose it's ye same olde problem of missing table end tags. OK, I'll look at that. Does the main search look OK? (http://www.postgresql.org/search.cgi) Regards, Dave.
"Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> writes: >> Well, on that front, http://archives.postgresql.org/dev/ >> renders fine in Netscape 4.7, but the search-results page >> comes up dead blank (and has for the past week or so). I >> suppose it's ye same olde problem of missing table end tags. > OK, I'll look at that. Does the main search look OK? > (http://www.postgresql.org/search.cgi) Yeah, that page renders fine (where "fine" means "looks about the same as Mozilla"). It's just the page that you get after you enter a query that's blank. [tries it again to be sure...] Oh, that's interesting, today it seems to render correctly. Marc must have fixed it last night. <emily lutella>Never mind</> regards, tom lane
> -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us] > Sent: 02 February 2004 15:29 > To: Dave Page > Cc: Marc G. Fournier; pgsql-www@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Archives cleaned up ... but not > regenerated yet ... > > > [tries it again to be sure...] Oh, that's interesting, today > it seems to render correctly. Marc must have fixed it last night. Yeah, I found a typo in a table tag and just fixed it... > <emily lutella>Never mind</> ? Regards, Dave.
"Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> writes: >> [tries it again to be sure...] Oh, that's interesting, today >> it seems to render correctly. Marc must have fixed it last night. > Yeah, I found a typo in a table tag and just fixed it... Ah, excellent. Thanks. >> <emily lutella>Never mind</> > ? sigh, should be "litella". http://obits.com/radnergilda.html regards, tom lane