Thread: array_to_string
Hi there, I used the function array_to_string, and I found it ignores NULL values, e.g. array_to_string( 'ARRAY[1,NULL,3]', ',' ) returns '1,3'. The function documentation doesn't explain this case. So please tell me: is it the normal behavior or a bug ? TIA, Sabin
"Sabin Coanda" <sabin.coanda@deuromedia.ro> writes: > I used the function array_to_string, and I found it ignores NULL values, > e.g. array_to_string( 'ARRAY[1,NULL,3]', ',' ) returns '1,3'. Do you have a better idea? regards, tom lane
Tom Lane wrote: > "Sabin Coanda" <sabin.coanda@deuromedia.ro> writes: >> I used the function array_to_string, and I found it ignores NULL values, >> e.g. array_to_string( 'ARRAY[1,NULL,3]', ',' ) returns '1,3'. > > Do you have a better idea? If you're being strict it should presumably return NULL for the whole string. Or you'd need a "coalesce-to-this" parameter. -- Richard Huxton Archonet Ltd
Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> "Sabin Coanda" <sabin.coanda@deuromedia.ro> writes: >>> I used the function array_to_string, and I found it ignores NULL values, >>> e.g. array_to_string( 'ARRAY[1,NULL,3]', ',' ) returns '1,3'. >> >> Do you have a better idea? > If you're being strict it should presumably return NULL for the whole > string. Or you'd need a "coalesce-to-this" parameter. If the whole array is NULL it would return NULL, but that seems unhelpful for a single element being NULL ... regards, tom lane
Tom Lane wrote: > Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com> writes: >> Tom Lane wrote: >>> "Sabin Coanda" <sabin.coanda@deuromedia.ro> writes: >>>> I used the function array_to_string, and I found it ignores NULL values, >>>> e.g. array_to_string( 'ARRAY[1,NULL,3]', ',' ) returns '1,3'. >>> Do you have a better idea? > >> If you're being strict it should presumably return NULL for the whole >> string. Or you'd need a "coalesce-to-this" parameter. > > If the whole array is NULL it would return NULL, but that seems > unhelpful for a single element being NULL ... It's the least surprising choice though. You'd expect array_to_string() to be a loop doing something like: output = output || connector || arr[i] Of course this will produce NULL if any of the inputs are NULL. Now that might be unhelpful, but that's NULL for you. All you're doing is (presumably) adding a hidden test to the loop where Sabin seemed to expect COALESCE(arr[i],<something>). I'm not sure either is better across the board. The problem comes with what <something> should be. You're either looking at a third parameter or perhaps more cleanly you need a coalesce_array(ARRAY,VAL) function which produces an output array where all the null elemts are replaced by VAL. -- Richard Huxton Archonet Ltd
"Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote in message news:20090.1175006990@sss.pgh.pa.us... > "Sabin Coanda" <sabin.coanda@deuromedia.ro> writes: >> I used the function array_to_string, and I found it ignores NULL values, >> e.g. array_to_string( 'ARRAY[1,NULL,3]', ',' ) returns '1,3'. > > Do you have a better idea? > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at > > http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate > I found the function would be useful to build dynamic statements that includes array items. For instance I have a function with an array argument of integer. In that function I'd like to send that argument by a dynamic string to other function. If array_to_string would return the whole elements, including NULLs, I'd be able to build that statement. But with the present behavior, the result statement damages the array structure. On the other hand, I saw there is available its complement function string_to_array. It would be nice to be able to reverse a string built by array_to_string, with string_to_array, getting the original array. This could happen if the function would consider the NULLs as well. A simple 'NULL' string would be enough to fulfil this reversing process, so that array_to_string( ARRAY[1,NULL,3], ',' ) would returns '1,NULL,3'. A problem will occur when it would be applied to string arrays, because NULL string, and 'NULL' string value would have the same result. This could be solved if the string arrays would be formed with the same rules as for SQL constant syntax. I mean with quotes. So that, array_to_string( ARRAY[ 'a', 'NULL', NULL, 'b'], '/' ) would return not a/NULL/NULL/b , but 'a'/'NULL'/NULL/'b'. Consequently, string_to_array function should interpret this result. Regards, Sabin