Thread: PgAgent logging verbosity
Hi list,
I would like to know if I set the debug mode to 2 (-l 2) in the pgAgent connection string it could spend much cpu processing.
I have other things running in the server and I don't like to create problem to others.
--
Ezequias Rodrigues da Rocha
http://ezequiasrocha.blogspot.com/
use Mozilla Firefox:http://br.mozdev.org/firefox/
I would like to know if I set the debug mode to 2 (-l 2) in the pgAgent connection string it could spend much cpu processing.
I have other things running in the server and I don't like to create problem to others.
--
Ezequias Rodrigues da Rocha
http://ezequiasrocha.blogspot.com/
use Mozilla Firefox:http://br.mozdev.org/firefox/
Ezequias Rodrigues da Rocha wrote: > Hi list, > > I would like to know if I set the debug mode to 2 (-l 2) in the pgAgent > connection string it could spend much cpu processing. > > I have other things running in the server and I don't like to create > problem to others. Please stop cross posting to lots of lists! -l 2 is extremely unlikely to cause excessive CPU or IO, but it will clutter logs, so you wouldn't want to leave it on permanently. Regards, Dave
Ok I will use only on error ok ? -l 0 :) Thank you Dave Page escreveu: > Ezequias Rodrigues da Rocha wrote: >> Hi list, >> >> I would like to know if I set the debug mode to 2 (-l 2) in the >> pgAgent connection string it could spend much cpu processing. >> >> I have other things running in the server and I don't like to create >> problem to others. > > Please stop cross posting to lots of lists! > > -l 2 is extremely unlikely to cause excessive CPU or IO, but it will > clutter logs, so you wouldn't want to leave it on permanently. > > Regards, Dave > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly >
Ezequias R. da Rocha wrote: > Ok I will use only on error ok ? > > -l 0 > > :) In the normal case, yes, that is what I'd use (0 is the default in fact, so you can omit the option altogether). Regard,s Dave