Thread: HeapTuple->t_tableOid==0 after SPI_exec
Hi, i notice that when HeapTuple data are populated by a trigger then the table oid can be retrieved from HeapTuple->t_tableOid. When HeapTuple is populated by SPI_exec("select * from foobar when id=667"); tuple = SPI_tuptable->tvals[0] (id is PK and row with 667 exists) then tuple->t_tableOid is always 0. Is it a known issue?? Am i missing something? -Achilleus
achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com writes: > When HeapTuple is populated by > SPI_exec("select * from foobar when id=667"); > tuple = SPI_tuptable->tvals[0] (id is PK and row with 667 exists) > then tuple->t_tableOid is always 0. The result of a SELECT is never a raw table tuple, not even when it's a straight "select * from foo". It's a constructed tuple that belongs to no particular table --- which makes sense because in general it wouldn't match any particular table's rowtype. I think in 7.4 there may be an optimization that skips the tuple projection step in this particular case, but if you can in fact see t_tableOid in 7.4, it'd be an implementation artifact rather than something we will promise to support in future. The correct way if you want to see tableoid is to select it: select tableoid,* from foobar where ... and then extract it from the result using the usual field-access routines. regards, tom lane
achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com writes: > are there gonna be changes in SPI or internal structs in 7.4? No more than usual ;-). You will need to recompile shared libraries, but (in theory) source code changes shouldn't be needed. You might want to think about upgrading elog() calls to ereport() though. regards, tom lane
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Tom Lane wrote: > > I think in 7.4 there may be an optimization that skips the tuple > projection step in this particular case, but if you can in fact see > t_tableOid in 7.4, it'd be an implementation artifact rather than > something we will promise to support in future. The correct way if you > want to see tableoid is to select it: > > select tableoid,* from foobar where ... > > and then extract it from the result using the usual field-access > routines. Thanx. P.S. are there gonna be changes in SPI or internal structs in 7.4? > > regards, tom lane > -- -Achilleus