Thread: Anything I can still do for this CF?

Anything I can still do for this CF?

From
"Kevin Grittner"
Date:
After a vacation without much Internet access, sandwiched between a
bunch of family emergencies, I'm now caught up on email and should be
in a position to try to do something useful in the PostgreSQL world
starting tomorrow.  Is there anything I can do to help with a patch
review at this point, or should I focus on follow-up to the feedback I
got on the LSB init script?  (Specifically, that is primarily about
identifying where pg_ctl doesn't currently "do the right thing" for
LSB conformance, so that we can discuss which of those differences
should be covered by changes to pg_ctl, and which should be left to
scripting.)

I'm happy to pitch in wherever I might be useful.

-Kevin

Re: Anything I can still do for this CF?

From
Jeff Davis
Date:
On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 17:08 -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Is there anything I can do to help with a patch
> review at this point

"Named and mixed notation support" could probably use a second pass
before a committer reviews it. Also, Robert Haas mentioned that "Lock
wait statistics" could use some more input.

"writable CTEs" is a cool feature, but it's run into some problems with
rules:

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-10/msg00242.php

If you have any ideas, perhaps that feature can be saved.

Regards,
    Jeff Davis


Re: Anything I can still do for this CF?

From
Robert Haas
Date:
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 17:08 -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
>> Is there anything I can do to help with a patch
>> review at this point
>
> "Named and mixed notation support" could probably use a second pass
> before a committer reviews it. Also, Robert Haas mentioned that "Lock
> wait statistics" could use some more input.
>
> "writable CTEs" is a cool feature, but it's run into some problems with
> rules:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-10/msg00242.php
>
> If you have any ideas, perhaps that feature can be saved.

I also think "Reworks for Access Controls" and "Largeobject access
controls" could also use some further looking over, and the ECPG
patches need a good bit of work too.

...Robert