Thread: Re: AW: Compilation on Solaris 2.8

Re: AW: Compilation on Solaris 2.8

From
Oyvind Hallsteinsen
Date:
"Schnabel, Andre" wrote:
> for "ldd -r" I'm getting the same messages as you get.
>
> I use the GNU-linker. PostgrSQL ist directly built to /usr/local.
>
> Do you know, how to check the libraries on IRIX64? I use an octane as backup
> system. I wonder if the same problem occures on sgi.

Check out this page:
http://linux.umbc.edu/lug-mailing-list/1999-07/msg00940.html

I don't know if this program, 'elfdump', has any equivalent to ldd's
"-r" option, but it's worth a try.

Back to the original problem - as both you and me have the same problem
with libpq.so I've got a hunch it's not our own fault. At least I would
be more comfortable believing it's a bug :)

---
-- Øyvind Hallsteinsen, HIST AITeL --

Compilation on Solaris 2.8

From
A_Schnabel@t-online.de (Andre Schnabel)
Date:
Hi,

looks like Greadbridge is shipping PostgreSQL 7.1 for Sun Solaris soon.
http://www.postgresql.com/product/software.php

Does anybody know if (and how) they solved the problem of the undefined
symbols in libpq.so.2 and plpgsql.so ?

btw.
sgi "elfdump" seems to have no equvalent option to ldd -r. At least I don't
get any errors on IRIX, but didn't test with php. (No need of php yet)

Andre

----- Original Message -----
From: Oyvind Hallsteinsen
To: pgsql-ports@postgresql.org
Cc: Schnabel, Andre
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 9:29 AM
Subject: Re: AW: [PORTS] Compilation on Solaris 2.8


"Schnabel, Andre" wrote:
> for "ldd -r" I'm getting the same messages as you get.
>
> I use the GNU-linker. PostgrSQL ist directly built to /usr/local.
>
> Do you know, how to check the libraries on IRIX64? I use an octane as
backup
> system. I wonder if the same problem occures on sgi.

Check out this page:
http://linux.umbc.edu/lug-mailing-list/1999-07/msg00940.html

I don't know if this program, 'elfdump', has any equivalent to ldd's
"-r" option, but it's worth a try.

Back to the original problem - as both you and me have the same problem
with libpq.so I've got a hunch it's not our own fault. At least I would
be more comfortable believing it's a bug :)

---
-- Øyvind Hallsteinsen, HIST AITeL --

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org


Re: Compilation on Solaris 2.8

From
Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Andre Schnabel writes:

> Does anybody know if (and how) they solved the problem of the undefined
> symbols in libpq.so.2 and plpgsql.so ?

I don't see mention of these problems in the mailing list archives.  Would
you care to repeat them?

--
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net   http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter


Re: Compilation on Solaris 2.8

From
A_Schnabel@t-online.de (Andre Schnabel)
Date:
Sorry,

I did not post in the original thread.
The message, I refere to was:
    From: Oyvind Hallsteinsen
    To: pgsql-ports@postgresql.org
    Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 1:02 PM
    Subject: [PORTS] Undefined symbols in pgsql libraries using Solaris
2.8/Sparc



----- Original Message -----
From: Peter Eisentraut
To: Andre Schnabel
Cc: ML: Postgres Ports
Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2001 11:49 AM
Subject: Re: [PORTS] Compilation on Solaris 2.8


Andre Schnabel writes:

> Does anybody know if (and how) they solved the problem of the undefined
> symbols in libpq.so.2 and plpgsql.so ?

I don't see mention of these problems in the mailing list archives.  Would
you care to repeat them?

--
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net   http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly