Thread: 7.1RC1 regression results: anyone want them ?
I have built and run "gmake check" on OpenBSD 2.8-stable (i386) and all appears well. I tried a cursury glance through the docs to see if there was a suitable place and instructions for regression tests, but I found none. Anyone want them ? I would like to see OpenBSD in the supported platforms list. -- Peter Galbavy Knowledge Matters Ltd. http://www.knowledge.com/
> I have built and run "gmake check" on OpenBSD 2.8-stable (i386) and all
> appears well. I tried a cursury glance through the docs to see if there was
> a suitable place and instructions for regression tests, but I found none.
> Anyone want them ?
Yes!
> I would like to see OpenBSD in the supported platforms list.
It is there for the upcoming release, as of a few days ago. But
confirmation that it works for more than one tester is very important,
so thanks for the report.
- Thomas
> It is there for the upcoming release, as of a few days ago. But > confirmation that it works for more than one tester is very important, > so thanks for the report. You are welcome. On thinking about it, the only slight problem was that the default max procs per user (64) was too few and I had to up it to 128 for the "gmake check" to complete. I may be able to test OpenBSD/sparc but only after the 7.1 release - what I mean is more than a few weeks. Peter
> You are welcome. On thinking about it, the only slight problem was that the
> default max procs per user (64) was too few and I had to up it to 128 for
> the "gmake check" to complete.
That is in the "tuning" category, so I won't bother mentioning it in the
one liner summary.
> I may be able to test OpenBSD/sparc but only after the 7.1 release - what I
> mean is more than a few weeks.
Great! Do you happen to know anyone who could test earlier? Just asking;
at this time of the release cycle I get unreasonably focused on getting
our "platform scorecard" higher ;)
- Thomas
Peter Galbavy writes: > You are welcome. On thinking about it, the only slight problem was that the > default max procs per user (64) was too few and I had to up it to 128 for > the "gmake check" to complete. There is some documentation about this here http://www.postgresql.org/devel-corner/docs/postgres/kernel-resources.html#AEN12974 but I can see how this could be hard to find offhand. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://yi.org/peter-e/