Thread: Re: [PORTS] Status of Linux/Strongarm?

Re: [PORTS] Status of Linux/Strongarm?

From
"segfault"
Date:
Hi everyone,

>Thomas Lockhart wrote:
>>
>> > I found a netwinder site at netwinder.org, and they have RPMs for
6.5.1,
>> > so my guess is that they believe it works on Redhat/Strongarm...
>> > http://www.netwinder.org/allrpms.html


Well, it built fine (with minor tweaking of the configure stuff) and seems
to run. I only did very basic stuff like creating a new db, adding a table
and a couple of items to it, then selecting from it.

>> Is the strongarm the same as arm32? That's what we list already for
>> netbsd. Or is strongarm a distinct architecture which should be listed
>> separately?


StrongARM is the name of the chip .. it's the Intel (formerly Digital)
SA-110, a 32-bit RISC processor.. probably the same as arm32, yes.

>armv41 is the architecture listed for the RPM's mentioned. The patchset
>is attached.
>
>I'm going to look at integrating this into the 6.5.3 RPM's -- but this
>really should be in the main tarball, IMO.  There's no big patches made
>-- the whole set is only 2K.
>
>I've added Mark Knox to the cc: list, as he put together this RPM set
>from the RawHide 6.5.1-0.8 rpm.  Mark, I'll be releasing 6.5.3 RPM's as
>soon as 6.5.3 is official, and I'd like to get arm supported by it.
>Just wanted to add you to the loop.


Excellent, thanks. I'll be happy to build/test your ARM packages if you need
it.



Re: [PORTS] Status of Linux/Strongarm?

From
Lamar Owen
Date:
On Sat, 06 Nov 1999, segfault wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> >I've added Mark Knox to the cc: list, as he put together this RPM set
> >from the RawHide 6.5.1-0.8 rpm.  Mark, I'll be releasing 6.5.3 RPM's as
> >soon as 6.5.3 is official, and I'd like to get arm supported by it.
> >Just wanted to add you to the loop.

> Excellent, thanks. I'll be happy to build/test your ARM packages if you need
> it.

Please; http://www.ramifordistat.net/postgres/SRPMS/postgresql-6.5.3-1.src.rpm

I incorporated your 'postgresql-6.5.1-armlinux.patch (with a rename to 6.5.3),
and the changes to the spec file to patch only if arm -- the patchset is now in
the CURRENT (pre-7.0) CVS tree, per Bruce.  PostgreSQL 7.0 shouldn't require
any special handling, since your template is now in.

Oh, 6.5.3 is now official :-).

--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11