Thread: Vacuum duration + hint bits?

Vacuum duration + hint bits?

From
bricklen
Date:
Hi, I have a question about a db-wide vacuum that I am running that is taking a much longer time than normal. We switched over to our warm standby server today -- which is virtually identical to the source db server -- and I initiated a "vacuum analyze verbose". Normally this process wouldn't take more than 6 hours, but so far we are well over 9 hours. I seem to recall reading in one of these pg lists that a db-wide vacuum of a new (?) database would go about setting the hint bits and cause a lot more disk IO than is normal. Is that a possible cause.

Postgresql 8.2.13, RHEL5

Sorry, I realize I'm short on details, but I'm just running out the door and the thought about hint bits struck me.

Cheers!

Re: Vacuum duration + hint bits?

From
Tom Lane
Date:
bricklen <bricklen@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi, I have a question about a db-wide vacuum that I am running that is
> taking a much longer time than normal. We switched over to our warm standby
> server today -- which is virtually identical to the source db server -- and
> I initiated a "vacuum analyze verbose". Normally this process wouldn't take
> more than 6 hours, but so far we are well over 9 hours. I seem to recall
> reading in one of these pg lists that a db-wide vacuum of a new (?) database
> would go about setting the hint bits and cause a lot more disk IO than is
> normal. Is that a possible cause.

Yeah, it seems possible.  You could look at vmstat to see if there's
tons of write activity ...

            regards, tom lane

Re: Vacuum duration + hint bits?

From
bricklen
Date:
Yeah, there's a lot. Way more than I am accustomed to seeing from the same command on the previous server.

On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
bricklen <bricklen@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi, I have a question about a db-wide vacuum that I am running that is
> taking a much longer time than normal. We switched over to our warm standby
> server today -- which is virtually identical to the source db server -- and
> I initiated a "vacuum analyze verbose". Normally this process wouldn't take
> more than 6 hours, but so far we are well over 9 hours. I seem to recall
> reading in one of these pg lists that a db-wide vacuum of a new (?) database
> would go about setting the hint bits and cause a lot more disk IO than is
> normal. Is that a possible cause.

Yeah, it seems possible.  You could look at vmstat to see if there's
tons of write activity ...

                       regards, tom lane