Thread: pg_xlog on same drive as OS
greetings! on a dedicated pgsql server is putting pg_xlog in drive as OS almost equivalent to putting on a seperate drive? in both case the actual data files are in a seperate drive. regds mallah
Mallah, > on a dedicated pgsql server is putting pg_xlog > in drive as OS almost equivalent to putting on a seperate > drive? Yes. If I have limited drives, this is what I do. -- -Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco
In the last exciting episode, mallah@trade-india.com wrote: > greetings! > on a dedicated pgsql server is putting pg_xlog > in drive as OS almost equivalent to putting on a seperate > drive? > > in both case the actual data files are in a seperate > drive. Well, if the OS drive is relatively inactive, then it may be "separate enough" that you won't find performance hurt too much by this. -- If this was helpful, <http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=cbbrowne> rate me http://cbbrowne.com/info/postgresql.html MICROS~1 is not the answer. MICROS~1 is the question. NO (or Linux) is the answer.