Thread: still alive?
I thought -patches was supposed to die. What happened? -- ams
Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote: > I thought -patches was supposed to die. What happened? I was wondering the same thing. Peter? -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
Bruce Momjian wrote: > Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote: >> I thought -patches was supposed to die. What happened? > > I was wondering the same thing. Peter? Hmm, let's try this: Anyone who thinks the patches list should remain as separate from hackers, shout now (with rationale)!
--On Donnerstag, September 11, 2008 15:39:01 +0300 Peter Eisentraut
<peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
>
> Hmm, let's try this:
>
> Anyone who thinks the patches list should remain as separate from
> hackers, shout now (with rationale)!
Seems i've missed something, what's then supposed to hold patches now?
--
Thanks
Bernd
Bernd Helmle wrote: > --On Donnerstag, September 11, 2008 15:39:01 +0300 Peter Eisentraut > <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: > >> >> Hmm, let's try this: >> >> Anyone who thinks the patches list should remain as separate from >> hackers, shout now (with rationale)! > > Seems i've missed something, what's then supposed to hold patches now? pgsql-hackers -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
Bernd Helmle wrote: > --On Donnerstag, September 11, 2008 15:39:01 +0300 Peter Eisentraut > <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: >> Anyone who thinks the patches list should remain as separate from >> hackers, shout now (with rationale)! > > Seems i've missed something, what's then supposed to hold patches now? Just send them to pgsql-hackers. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
--On Mittwoch, September 17, 2008 22:37:29 +0300 Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Just send them to pgsql-hackers.
Oh, that's fine, since discussions are already moved from -patches and are
continued there. The only disadvantage i see is that -hackers is a little
more frequented than -patches, but that isn't something which can't be
managed with some intelligent filtering.
So +1 from my side, if that counts.
--
Thanks
Bernd
On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 15:39 +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote: > >> I thought -patches was supposed to die. What happened? > > > > I was wondering the same thing. Peter? > > Hmm, let's try this: > > Anyone who thinks the patches list should remain as separate from > hackers, shout now (with rationale)! Kill it now, long enough before the next patchfest for it to stick. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
Simon Riggs wrote: > On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 15:39 +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> Bruce Momjian wrote: >>> Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote: >>>> I thought -patches was supposed to die. What happened? >>> I was wondering the same thing. Peter? >> Hmm, let's try this: >> >> Anyone who thinks the patches list should remain as separate from >> hackers, shout now (with rationale)! > > Kill it now, long enough before the next patchfest for it to stick. I think what we need now, for patches, ports, and the others, is someone to actually kill it. All the talk has been talked, everything has been decided, now someone with the right permission bits just turn it off.
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Simon Riggs wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 15:39 +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > >> Bruce Momjian wrote: > >>> Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote: > >>>> I thought -patches was supposed to die. What happened? > >>> I was wondering the same thing. Peter? > >> Hmm, let's try this: > >> > >> Anyone who thinks the patches list should remain as separate from > >> hackers, shout now (with rationale)! > > > > Kill it now, long enough before the next patchfest for it to stick. > > I think what we need now, for patches, ports, and the others, is someone > to actually kill it. All the talk has been talked, everything has been > decided, now someone with the right permission bits just turn it off. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
Marc, care to do the honors? --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Simon Riggs wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 15:39 +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > >> Bruce Momjian wrote: > >>> Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote: > >>>> I thought -patches was supposed to die. What happened? > >>> I was wondering the same thing. Peter? > >> Hmm, let's try this: > >> > >> Anyone who thinks the patches list should remain as separate from > >> hackers, shout now (with rationale)! > > > > Kill it now, long enough before the next patchfest for it to stick. > > I think what we need now, for patches, ports, and the others, is someone > to actually kill it. All the talk has been talked, everything has been > decided, now someone with the right permission bits just turn it off. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
On Wed, 1 Oct 2008 20:05:00 -0400 (EDT) Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > > Marc, care to do the honors? KILL IT!!!!!! :P > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > Simon Riggs wrote: > > > On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 15:39 +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > >> Bruce Momjian wrote: > > >>> Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote: > > >>>> I thought -patches was supposed to die. What happened? > > >>> I was wondering the same thing. Peter? > > >> Hmm, let's try this: > > >> > > >> Anyone who thinks the patches list should remain as separate > > >> from hackers, shout now (with rationale)! > > > > > > Kill it now, long enough before the next patchfest for it to > > > stick. > > > > I think what we need now, for patches, ports, and the others, is > > someone to actually kill it. All the talk has been talked, > > everything has been decided, now someone with the right permission > > bits just turn it off. > -- The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/ United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/
Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Marc, care to do the honors? > Note: 1. there are several lists to kill, not just pgsql-patches. The database says: pgsql-chat pgsql-benchmarks pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-hackers-pitr pgsql-cygwin pgsql-ports 2. The archives must, obviously, survive the kill, and still be fetchable via rsync to the archives server. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.