Thread: Hibernate Dialects for PostgreSQL
I enclose 3 Dialects for PostgreSQL, as discussed on -hackers. The PostgreSQL83Dialect is essentially identical to 82Dialect, but the principle of having one file per release seems easiest way of doing things. Further additions very welcome; I don't suppose at all this is the final version. -- Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
Attachment
Simon Riggs wrote: > I enclose 3 Dialects for PostgreSQL, as discussed on -hackers. There is no such thing as PostgreSQL 8. Please don't do that; it would confuse users about the versioning scheme. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 14:28 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Simon Riggs wrote: > > I enclose 3 Dialects for PostgreSQL, as discussed on -hackers. > > There is no such thing as PostgreSQL 8. Please don't do that; it would > confuse users about the versioning scheme. Would 8x be the right thing then? So PostgreSQL8xDialect or PostgreSQL80Dialect or ... -- Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 01:41:49PM +0000, Simon Riggs wrote: > On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 14:28 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > Simon Riggs wrote: > > > I enclose 3 Dialects for PostgreSQL, as discussed on -hackers. > > > > There is no such thing as PostgreSQL 8. Please don't do that; it would > > confuse users about the versioning scheme. > > Would 8x be the right thing then? > > So PostgreSQL8xDialect or PostgreSQL80Dialect or ... I'd say 80 so it's easy to separate off 81, 82, 83, etc. :) Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
Am Montag, 12. November 2007 schrieb Simon Riggs: > On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 14:28 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > Simon Riggs wrote: > > > I enclose 3 Dialects for PostgreSQL, as discussed on -hackers. > > > > There is no such thing as PostgreSQL 8. Please don't do that; it would > > confuse users about the versioning scheme. > > Would 8x be the right thing then? > > So PostgreSQL8xDialect or PostgreSQL80Dialect or ... If you know it doesn't work before 8.0, PostgreSQL80Dialect sounds right. Otherwise just PostgreSQLDialect or perhaps something like PostgreSQL{Base| Abstract}Dialect. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/