Thread: Proposed patch for rules with RETURNING
Attached is a draft patch that makes rules support RETURNING as per my
proposal of earlier today, ie, have the rewriter automatically adjust a
RETURNING clause present in an unconditional INSTEAD rule. The core of
the patch is barely twenty lines (the code added to rewriteRuleAction)
--- the rest is error checking to reject invalid rules.
Comments, objections?
regards, tom lane
Attachment
On 9/1/06, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Attached is a draft patch that makes rules support RETURNING ... What format is that patch in? Either something's wrong or Gmail just went really wacko. -- Jonah H. Harris, Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1300 EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301 33 Wood Ave S, 2nd Floor | jharris@enterprisedb.com Iselin, New Jersey 08830 | http://www.enterprisedb.com/
Jonah H. Harris wrote: > On 9/1/06, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Attached is a draft patch that makes rules support RETURNING ... > > What format is that patch in? Either something's wrong or Gmail just > went really wacko. I see the attachment fine. -- Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
"Jonah H. Harris" <jonah.harris@gmail.com> writes:
> On 9/1/06, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Attached is a draft patch that makes rules support RETURNING ...
> What format is that patch in? Either something's wrong or Gmail just
> went really wacko.
It's just a gzip'd patch diff.
regards, tom lane