pgman wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > > The attached patch checks for the file, and either user it or generates
> > > a log message that it was skipped.
> >
> > I still can't get excited about this. Who will it help? The DBA who is
> > silly enough to think his ancient SSL library supports CRL is probably
> > also silly enough not to read the postmaster log carefully. It would
> > make a whole lot more sense just to document that OpenSSL < whatever
> > doesn't support CRL.
>
> Why hard-code something if we can dynamically report it, and NetBSD 2.0
> isn't that old.
Sorry, I meant NetBSD 1.6/canary:
http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_history.pl?nm=canary&br=HEAD
Anyway, if we are doing CRL, we should do it right.
--
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
