Thread: bug fix - plperl %_SHARED misspelled

bug fix - plperl %_SHARED misspelled

From
Andrew Dunstan
Date:

While building some better plperl tests today I discovered a horrid bug
(which I regret to say is my fault), present in both 8.0 and HEAD
branches, The attached patch needs to be applied urgently to both
branches, please.

cheers

andrew

Index: plperl.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/pgsql/src/pl/plperl/plperl.c,v
retrieving revision 1.73
diff -c -r1.73 plperl.c
*** plperl.c    6 May 2005 17:24:55 -0000       1.73
--- plperl.c    21 May 2005 20:56:02 -0000
***************
*** 226,232 ****
        "$PLContainer->permit_only(':default');"
        "$PLContainer->permit(qw[:base_math !:base_io sort time]);"
        "$PLContainer->share(qw[&elog &spi_exec_query &DEBUG &LOG "
!     "&INFO &NOTICE &WARNING &ERROR %SHARED ]);"
        "sub ::mksafefunc { return $PLContainer->reval(qq[sub { $_[0]
$_[1]}]); }"
                           ;

--- 226,232 ----
        "$PLContainer->permit_only(':default');"
        "$PLContainer->permit(qw[:base_math !:base_io sort time]);"
        "$PLContainer->share(qw[&elog &spi_exec_query &DEBUG &LOG "
!     "&INFO &NOTICE &WARNING &ERROR %_SHARED ]);"
        "sub ::mksafefunc { return $PLContainer->reval(qq[sub { $_[0]
$_[1]}]); }"
                           ;



Re: bug fix - plperl %_SHARED misspelled

From
Neil Conway
Date:
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> While building some better plperl tests today I discovered a horrid bug
> (which I regret to say is my fault), present in both 8.0 and HEAD
> branches

BTW, in future it would be good to specify the consequences of the bug
(i.e. beyond "it is horrible"), so committers who don't use pl/perl can
judge the urgency of the bug.

> The attached patch needs to be applied urgently to both
> branches, please.

Applied, thanks.

-Neil

Re: bug fix - plperl %_SHARED misspelled

From
"Andrew Dunstan"
Date:
Neil Conway said:
>
> BTW, in future it would be good to specify the consequences of the bug
> (i.e. beyond "it is horrible"), so committers who don't use pl/perl can
>  judge the urgency of the bug.


Yes, sorry. In fact, fortuitously the effects are not disastrous in most
circumstances. Once we turn on strict mode they would become severe -
%_SHARED would be unusable. But fixing the error has zero downside impact.

cheers

andrew