Thread: More fixes for pg_dump

This patch does two things to pg_dump:

* Dumps comments on columns of composite types

* Instead of putting all the OWNER TO commands at the end, it dumps then
after each object.  This is WAY more readable and nice.  ACLs are still
at the end.

Chris

Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
> This patch does two things to pg_dump:

> * Dumps comments on columns of composite types

> * Instead of putting all the OWNER TO commands at the end, it dumps then
> after each object.  This is WAY more readable and nice.  ACLs are still
> at the end.

Applied.  I notice though that the line numbers don't seem to match CVS
tip, which suggests that you've got some patches still unapplied?  If
so, Bruce seems to have missed adding them to the patch queue.

            regards, tom lane

Tom Lane wrote:
> Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
> > This patch does two things to pg_dump:
>
> > * Dumps comments on columns of composite types
>
> > * Instead of putting all the OWNER TO commands at the end, it dumps then
> > after each object.  This is WAY more readable and nice.  ACLs are still
> > at the end.
>
> Applied.  I notice though that the line numbers don't seem to match CVS
> tip, which suggests that you've got some patches still unapplied?  If
> so, Bruce seems to have missed adding them to the patch queue.

I don't know of any.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

> Applied.  I notice though that the line numbers don't seem to match CVS
> tip, which suggests that you've got some patches still unapplied?  If
> so, Bruce seems to have missed adding them to the patch queue.

Hmmm, no...  Not sure what happened there.  The diff in the committers
email seemed fine however.

Chris