Thread: doc/src/sgml/ref/create_database.sgml had an extra tag

doc/src/sgml/ref/create_database.sgml had an extra tag

From
"Jonathan M. Gardner"
Date:
This is the error that openjade produced:

openjade:ref/create_database.sgml:177:7:E: document type does not allow
element "PARA" here; missing one of "FOOTNOTE", "ITEMIZEDLIST",
"ORDEREDLIST", "VARIABLELIST", "CAUTION", "IMPORTANT", "NOTE", "TIP",
"WARNING", "BLOCKQUOTE", "INFORMALEXAMPLE" start-tag
openjade:ref/create_database.sgml:186:7:E: document type does not allow
element "PARA" here; missing one of "FOOTNOTE", "ITEMIZEDLIST",
"ORDEREDLIST", "VARIABLELIST", "CAUTION", "IMPORTANT", "NOTE", "TIP",
"WARNING", "BLOCKQUOTE", "INFORMALEXAMPLE" start-tag
openjade:ref/create_database.sgml:194:11:E: end tag for "PARA" omitted,
but OMITTAG NO was specified
openjade:ref/create_database.sgml:175:2: start tag was here

This patch removes the extra <para> tag that caused the error.

--
Jonathan Gardner
jgardner@jonathangardner.net

Attachment

Re: doc/src/sgml/ref/create_database.sgml had an extra tag

From
Tom Lane
Date:
"Jonathan M. Gardner" <jgardner@jonathangardner.net> writes:
> openjade:ref/create_database.sgml:194:11:E: end tag for "PARA" omitted,
> but OMITTAG NO was specified
> openjade:ref/create_database.sgml:175:2: start tag was here

Yeah, I see it too on my RHL 8 machine.  The DTD being used at
postgresql.org seems to be less picky though, since that build
is going through without error ...

            regards, tom lane