Thread: Re: [HACKERS] Allow pg_dump to dump sequences using NO_MAXVALUE

Re: [HACKERS] Allow pg_dump to dump sequences using NO_MAXVALUE

From
Rod Taylor
Date:
On Sun, 2003-02-23 at 09:05, Gavin Sherry wrote:
> On 23 Feb 2003, Rod Taylor wrote:
>
> > - Move SEQ_MAXVALUE, SEQ_MINVALUE definitions to sequence.h
> >
> > - Add check in pg_dump to see if the value returned is the max /min
> > values and replace with NO MAXVALUE, NO MINVALUE.
> >
> > - Change START and INCREMENT to use START WITH and INCREMENT BY syntax.
> > This makes it a touch easier to port to other databases with sequences
> > (Oracle).  PostgreSQL supports both syntaxes already.
>
> +       char            bufm[100],
> +                               bufx[100];
>
> This seems to be an arbitary size. Why not set it to the actual maximum
> length?
>
> Also:
>
> +       snprintf(bufm, 100, INT64_FORMAT, SEQ_MINVALUE);
> +       snprintf(bufx, 100, INT64_FORMAT, SEQ_MAXVALUE);
>
> sizeof(bufm), sizeof(bufx) is probably the more
> maintenance-friendly/standard way to do it.

I changed the code to use sizeof - but will wait for a response from
Peter before changing the size.  It's consistent throughout the sequence
code to be 100 for this purpose.

http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql-server/src/backend/commands/sequence.c.diff?r1=1.85&r2=1.86

--
Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>

PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.asc

Attachment

Re: [HACKERS] Allow pg_dump to dump sequences using NO_MAXVALUE

From
Bruce Momjian
Date:
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:

    http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches

I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------


Rod Taylor wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> On Sun, 2003-02-23 at 09:05, Gavin Sherry wrote:
> > On 23 Feb 2003, Rod Taylor wrote:
> >
> > > - Move SEQ_MAXVALUE, SEQ_MINVALUE definitions to sequence.h
> > >
> > > - Add check in pg_dump to see if the value returned is the max /min
> > > values and replace with NO MAXVALUE, NO MINVALUE.
> > >
> > > - Change START and INCREMENT to use START WITH and INCREMENT BY syntax.
> > > This makes it a touch easier to port to other databases with sequences
> > > (Oracle).  PostgreSQL supports both syntaxes already.
> >
> > +       char            bufm[100],
> > +                               bufx[100];
> >
> > This seems to be an arbitary size. Why not set it to the actual maximum
> > length?
> >
> > Also:
> >
> > +       snprintf(bufm, 100, INT64_FORMAT, SEQ_MINVALUE);
> > +       snprintf(bufx, 100, INT64_FORMAT, SEQ_MAXVALUE);
> >
> > sizeof(bufm), sizeof(bufx) is probably the more
> > maintenance-friendly/standard way to do it.
>
> I changed the code to use sizeof - but will wait for a response from
> Peter before changing the size.  It's consistent throughout the sequence
> code to be 100 for this purpose.
>
> http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql-server/src/backend/commands/sequence.c.diff?r1=1.85&r2=1.86
>
> --
> Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>
>
> PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.asc

[ Attachment, skipping... ]
-- End of PGP section, PGP failed!

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

Re: [HACKERS] Allow pg_dump to dump sequences using NO_MAXVALUE

From
Bruce Momjian
Date:
Patch applied.  Thanks.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------


Rod Taylor wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> On Sun, 2003-02-23 at 09:05, Gavin Sherry wrote:
> > On 23 Feb 2003, Rod Taylor wrote:
> >
> > > - Move SEQ_MAXVALUE, SEQ_MINVALUE definitions to sequence.h
> > >
> > > - Add check in pg_dump to see if the value returned is the max /min
> > > values and replace with NO MAXVALUE, NO MINVALUE.
> > >
> > > - Change START and INCREMENT to use START WITH and INCREMENT BY syntax.
> > > This makes it a touch easier to port to other databases with sequences
> > > (Oracle).  PostgreSQL supports both syntaxes already.
> >
> > +       char            bufm[100],
> > +                               bufx[100];
> >
> > This seems to be an arbitary size. Why not set it to the actual maximum
> > length?
> >
> > Also:
> >
> > +       snprintf(bufm, 100, INT64_FORMAT, SEQ_MINVALUE);
> > +       snprintf(bufx, 100, INT64_FORMAT, SEQ_MAXVALUE);
> >
> > sizeof(bufm), sizeof(bufx) is probably the more
> > maintenance-friendly/standard way to do it.
>
> I changed the code to use sizeof - but will wait for a response from
> Peter before changing the size.  It's consistent throughout the sequence
> code to be 100 for this purpose.
>
> http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql-server/src/backend/commands/sequence.c.diff?r1=1.85&r2=1.86
>
> --
> Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>
>
> PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.asc

[ Attachment, skipping... ]
-- End of PGP section, PGP failed!

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073